As per the case facts, this appeal challenged a High Court judgment that dismissed the appellants' appeal and confirmed the Trial Court's judgment and decree. The original suit was filed ... by the Respondent Plaintiff for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of property. The appellants contended that the respondent plaintiff had not adduced cogent evidence to prove readiness and willingness or sufficient funds to discharge their part of the contract. The question arose whether the respondent plaintiff was entitled to the relief of specific performance given the lack of evidence regarding readiness and willingness to perform their part of the contract and availability of funds. Finally, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and Trial Court, stating that the respondent plaintiff was not entitled to the relief of specific performance. The earnest money was to be returned to the respondent plaintiff with interest.