As per case facts, a partition suit led to a Court Receiver being appointed for a property. Symbolic possession was taken while Suhrid Geigy Trading Limited occupied the premises. Later, ... ORG Systems began occupying the premises, prompting co-owners to file a Chamber Summons seeking possession. The High Court rejected the summons, misinterpreting a previous judgment and not considering various crucial facts. The question arose whether ORG Systems' induction without court leave was valid and if such a dispute could be resolved summarily or required formal proceedings under the Bombay Rent Act. Finally, the Supreme Court quashed the High Court's order, stating it misread the precedent case and overlooked key issues like non-renewal of the license agreement and the effect of specific Bombay Rent Act sections. The Court clarified that summary adjudication is possible depending on the dispute's nature and directed the High Court to re-examine the matter considering all relevant facts and legal provisions, emphasizing that a Receiver's powers shouldn't be unduly restricted.