As per case facts, plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The Trial Court dismissed it, but the First Appellate Court reversed the decision, decreeing ... the suit. The appellant, a subsequent vendee, challenged this reversal in the High Court. The original vendors had sold the property to subsequent vendees before the agreement's target date. Plaintiffs claimed readiness and willingness, sending a relative, not a Power of Attorney holder for purchase, to the Sub-Registrar's office. The question arose whether the plaintiffs adequately proved their readiness and willingness, and if the subsequent purchasers were bona fide purchasers without notice. Finally, the High Court found that plaintiffs failed to prove readiness and willingness, as their relative could not attest to their personal knowledge, and they delayed legal notice. It also concluded that the subsequent vendees were bona fide purchasers for value without notice. Consequently, the First Appellate Court's judgment was set aside, and the Trial Court's dismissal of the suit was restored.