As per case facts, the plaintiff wanted to buy a property, paid consideration to defendant No. 1, and received possession of part of the property. Following a public notice by ... defendant No. 2, the plaintiff filed a Civil Suit for specific performance and injunctions. The appellant, original defendant No. 2, filed a First Appeal challenging the Trial Court's judgment and decree. She argued that defendant No. 1 was not her agent, she received no payment, and no valid oral agreement was concluded. The question arose whether the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance, given defendant No. 2's claims of ownership and lack of agency for defendant No. 1. Finally, the High Court observed that defendant No. 1 managed the property and accepted full consideration with implied consent from other family members. The court dismissed the First Appeal, affirming the Trial Court's judgment and decree, finding no reason to interfere.