Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
Before we proceed to discuss the questions formulated above it is necessary to state the admitted facts of this case It is not disputed that the shop of which the
...appellant was a tenant was governed by the State Rent Act It is also not disputed that the tenanted shop was completely destroyed due to natural calamity i e by fire and it was not pulled down by the landlord It is also admitted that as a result of destruction the land on which the super structure stood was reduced to vacant land It is also not disputed that what was let out to the appellant was shop and not land beneath the shop It is also not disputed that the tenant made a new construction on the same site without the permission and consent of the landlord and the same was unauthorised
