Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per case facts, Respondent No.7 alleged petitioner lodged a false FIR for land encroachment. The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) found the police action unjustified, recommending action against
...the petitioner under the SC/ST Act and against police personnel, and directing status quo on land and ownership orders by administration. The petitioner filed a writ petition, arguing NCSC exceeded its jurisdiction. The question arose whether the NCSC has the power to issue mandatory directions for FIR registration, status quo, or ownership adjudication, or if its powers are only recommendatory. Finally, the High Court held that NCSC's powers are purely recommendatory, not judicial, and it cannot issue mandatory directions or interfere in investigations, land disputes, or ownership matters, thus the impugned directions were beyond its jurisdiction and unsustainable.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....