As per case facts, three criminal appeals and one criminal revision arise from a single FIR regarding the alleged rape of a minor victim by multiple accused, including the appellants ... and petitioner, and the creation of a video of the act. The victim initially withheld information due to threats but reported it after a video CD was given to her, leading to the FIR. The appellants challenge convictions from the trial court, while the petitioner challenges judgments from the Juvenile Justice Board and appellate court. The question arose whether the prosecution's case was credible despite arguments concerning FIR delay, the victim's age (disputing her minor status), inconsistencies in her statements, lack of mobile phone seizure for the video, and a motive of false implication over an unpaid loan. Finally, the High Court found no infirmity, illegality, or perversity in the lower court judgments, dismissing all appeals and the revision, upholding the convictions.