Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per case facts the petitioners were among individuals charged with murder as part of an unlawful assembly over a land dispute leading to two deaths and multiple injuries the
...Trial Court convicted and the High Court affirmed the conviction of leading to the appeal to the Supreme Court The question arose whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt specifically assessing the constructive liability under IPC Section amidst material inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and potential fabrication of the FIR Finally the Supreme Court allowed the appeal acquitting the remaining appellants applying the rule of prudence for large-assembly cases concluding that the inconsistencies in the injured eyewitnesses' accounts contradictions with medical evidence and the questionable nature of the foundational FIR did not meet the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt required to establish guilt or common object
