33. Anticipation by use and publication after provisional specification.—
(1) Where a complete
specification is filed or proceeded with in pursuance of an application which was accompanied by a
provisional specification or where a complete specification filed along with an application is treated by
virtue of a direction under sub-section
(3) of section 9 as a provisional specification, then,
notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Controller shall not refuse to grant the patent, and the
patent shall not be revoked or invalidated, by reason only that any matter described in the provisional
specification or in the specification treated as aforesaid as a provisional specification was used in India or
published in India or elsewhere at any time after the date of the filing of that specification.
1. Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 26, for “not later than six months” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
24
(2) Where a complete specification is filed in pursuance of a convention application, then,
notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Controller shall not refuse to grant the patent, and the
patent shall not be revoked or invalidated, by reason only that any matter disclosed in any application for
protection in a convention country upon which the convention application is founded was used in India or
published in India or elsewhere at any time after the date of that application for protection.
34. No anticipation if circumstances are only as described in sections 29, 30, 31
and 32.—Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Controller shall not refuse 1*** to grant a
patent, and a patent shall not be revoked or invalidated by reason only of any circumstances which, by
virtue of section 29 or section 30 or section 31 or section 32, do not constitute an anticipation of the
invention claimed in the specification.
CHAPTER VII
PROVISIONS FOR SECRECY OF CERTAIN INVENTIONS
35. Secrecy directions relating to inventions relevant for defence purposes.—
(1) Where, in
respect of an application made before or after the commencement of this Act for a patent, it appears to the
Controller that the invention is one of a class notified to him by the Central Government as relevant for
defence purposes, or, where otherwise the invention appears to him to be so relevant, he may give
directions for prohibiting or restricting the publication of information with respect to the invention or the
communication of such information 2***.
(2) Where the Controller gives any such directions as are referred to in sub-section
(1), he shall give
notice of the application and of the directions to the Central Government, and the Central Government
shall, upon receipt of such notice, consider whether the publication of the invention would be prejudicial
to the defence of India, and if upon such consideration, it appears to it that the publication of the invention
would not so prejudice, give notice to the Controller to that effect, who shall thereupon revoke the
directions and notify the applicant accordingly.
(3) Without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub-section
(1), where the Central Government
is of opinion that an invention in respect of which the Controller has not given any directions under
sub-section
(1), is relevant for defence purposes, it may at any time before 3[grant of patent] notify the
Controller to that effect, and thereupon the provisions of that sub-section shall apply as if the invention
were one of the class notified by the Central Government, and accordingly the Controller shall give notice
to the Central Government of the directions issued by him.
36. Secrecy directions to be periodically reviewed.—4[
(1) The question whether an invention in
respect of which directions have been given under section 35 continues to be relevant for defence
purposes shall be reconsidered by the Central Government at intervals of 5[six months] or on a request
made by the applicant which is found to be reasonable by the Controller and if, on such reconsideration it
appears to the Central Government that the publication of the invention would no longer be prejudicial to
the defence of India or in case of an application filed by a foreign applicant it is found that the invention
is published outside India it shall forthwith give notice to the Controller to revoke the direction and the
Controllers shall thereupon revoke the directions previously given by him.]
(2) The result of every re-consideration under sub-section
(1), shall be communicated to the applicant
within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed.
37. Consequences of secrecy directions.—
(1) So long as any directions under section 35 are in force
in respect of an application—
(a) the Controller shall not pass an order refusing 6[to grant] the same; and
1. The words “to accept complete specification for a patent or” omitted by Act 15 of 2005, s. 27 (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
2. The words “to any person or class of persons specified in the directions” omitted by Act 38 of 2002, s. 19 (w.e.f. 20-5-2003).
3. Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 28, for “acceptance of complete specification” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
4. Subs. by Act 38 of 2002, s. 20, for sub-section
(1) (w.e.f. 20-5-2003).
5 Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 29, for “twelve months” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
6. Subs. by s. 30, ibid., for “to accept” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
25
(b) notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, no appeal shall lie from any order of the
Controller passed in respect thereof:
1
[Provided that the application may, subject to the directions, proceed up to the stage of grant of the
patent, but the application and the specification found to be in order for grant of the patent shall not be
published, and no patent shall be granted in pursuance of that application.]
(2) Where a complete specification filed in pursuance of an application for a patent for an invention
in respect of which directions have been given under section 35 2[is found to be in order for grant of the
patent] during the continuance in force of the directions, then—
(a) if, during the continuance in force of the directions, any use of the invention is made by or on
behalf of, or to the order of the Government, the provisions of sections 100, 101 and 103 shall apply
in relation to that use as if the patent had been granted for the invention ; and
(b) if it appears to the Central Government that the applicant for the patent has suffered hardship
by reason of the continuance in force of the directions, the Central Government may make to him
such payment (if any) by way of solatium as appears to the Central Government to be reasonable
having regard to the novelty and utility of the invention and the purpose for which it is designed, and
to any other relevant circumstances.
(3) Where a patent is granted in pursuance of an application in respect of which directions have been
given under section 35, no renewal fee shall be payable in respect of any period during which those
directions were in force.
38. Revocation of secrecy directions and extension of time.—When any direction given under
section 35 is revoked by the Controller, then, notwithstanding any provision of this Act specifying the
time within which any step should be taken or any act done in connection with an application for the
patent, the Controller may, subject to such conditions, if any, as he thinks fit to impose, extend the time
for doing anything required or authorised to be done by or under this Act in connection with the
application, whether or not that time has previously expired.
3
[39. Residents not to apply for patents outside India without prior permission.—
(1) No person
resident in India shall, except under the authority of a written permit sought in the manner prescribed and
granted by or on behalf of the Controller, make or cause to be made any application outside India for the
grant of a patent for an invention unless—
(a) an application for a patent for the same invention has been made in India, not less than six
weeks before the application outside India; and
(b) either no direction has been given under sub-section
(1) of section 35 in relation to the
application in India, or all such directions have been revoked.
(2) The Controller shall dispose of every such application within such period as may be prescribed:
Provided that if the invention is relevant for defence purpose or atomic energy, the Controller shall
not grant permit without the prior consent of the Central Government.
(3) This section shall not apply in relation to an invention for which an application for protection has
first been filed in a country outside India by a person resident outside India.]
1. Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 30, for the proviso (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
2. Subs. by s. 30, ibid., for “is accepted” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
3. Subs by s. 31, ibid., for section 39 (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
26
40. Liability for contravention of section 35 or section 39.—Without prejudice to the provisions
contained in Chapter XX, if in respect of an application for a patent any person contravenes any direction
as to secrecy given by the Controller under section 35 1[or makes or causes to be made an application for
grant of a patent outside India in contravention of section 39], or the application for patent under this Act
shall be deemed to have been abandoned and the patent granted, if any, shall be liable to be revoked under
section 64.
41. Finality of orders of Controller and Central Government.—All orders of the Controller
giving directions as to secrecy as well as all orders of the Central Government under this Chapter shall be
final and shall not be called in question in any court on any ground whatsoever.
42. Savings respecting disclosure to Government.—Nothing in this Act shall be held to prevent
the disclosure by the Controller of information concerning an application for a patent or a specification
filed in pursuance thereof to the Central Government for the purpose of the application or specification
being examined for considering whether an order under this Chapter should be made or whether an order
so made should be revoked.
CHAPTER VIII
2
[GRANT OF PATENTS AND RIGHTS CONFERRED THEREBY]
3
[43. Grant of patents.—
(1) Where an application for a patent has been found to be in order for grant
of the patent and either—
(a) the application has not been refused by the Controller by virtue of any power vested in him by
this Act; or
(b) the application has not been found to be in contravention of any of the provisions of this Act,
the patent shall be granted as expeditiously as possible to the applicant or, in the case of a joint
application, to the applicants jointly, with the seal of the patent office and the date on which the patent is
granted shall be entered in the register.
(2) On the grant of patent, the Controller shall publish the fact that the patent has been granted and
thereupon the application, specification and other documents related thereto shall be open for public
inspection.]
44. Amendment of patent granted to deceased applicant.—Where, at any time after a patent has
been 4[granted] in pursuance of an application under this Act, the Controller is satisfied that the person to
whom the patent was granted had died, or, in the case of a body corporate, had ceased to exist, before the
patent was 4[granted], the Controller may amend the patent by substituting for the name of that person the
name of the person to whom the patent ought to have been granted, and the patent shall have effect, and
shall be deemed always to have had effect, accordingly.
45. Date of patent.—5[
(1) Subject to the other provisions contained in this Act, every patent shall be
dated as of the date on which the application for patent was filed.]
(2) The date of every patent shall be entered in the register.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no suit or other proceeding shall be
commenced or prosecuted in respect of an infringement committed before 6[the date of publication of the
application].
1. Ins. by Act 38 of 2002, s. 22 (w.e.f. 20-5-2003).
2. Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 32, for Chapter Heading (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
3. Subs. by s. 33, ibid., for section 43 (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
4. Subs. by s. 34, ibid., for “sealed” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
5. Subs. by Act 38 of 2002, s. 24, for sub-section
(1) (we.f. 20-5-2003).
6. Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 35, for certain words (we.f. 1-1-2005).
27
46. Form, extent and effect of patent.—
(1) Every patent shall be in the prescribed form and shall
have effect throughout India.
(2) A patent shall be granted for one invention only:
Provided that it shall not be competent for any person in a suit or other proceeding to take any
objection to a patent on the ground that it has been granted for more than one invention.
47. Grant of patents to be subject to certain conditions.—The grant of a patent under this Act shall
be subject to the condition that—
(1) any machine, apparatus or other article in respect of which the patent is granted or any article
made by using a process in respect of which the patent is granted, may be imported or made by or on
behalf of the Government for the purpose merely of its own use;
(2) any process in respect of which the patent is granted may be used by or on behalf of the
Government for the purpose merely of its own use;
(3) any machine, apparatus or other article in respect of which the patent is granted or any article
made by the use of the process in respect of which the patent is granted, may be made or used, and any
process in respect of which the patent is granted may be used, by any person, for the purpose merely of
experiment or research including the imparting of instructions to pupils; and
(4) in the case of a patent in respect of any medicine or drug, the medicine or drug may be imported
by the Government for the purpose merely of its own use or for distribution in any dispensary, hospital or
other medical institution maintained by or on behalf of the Government or any other dispensary, hospital
or other medical institution which the Central Government may, having regard to the public service that
such dispensary, hospital or medical institution renders, specify in this behalf by notification in the
Official Gazette.
1
[48. Rights of patentees.—Subject to the other provisions contained in this Act and the conditions
specified in section 47, a patent granted under this Act shall confer upon the patentee—
(a) where the subject matter of the patent is a product, the exclusive right to prevent third parties,
who do not have his consent, from the act of making, using, offering for sale, selling or importing for
those purposes that product in India;
(b) where the subject matter of the patent is a process, the exclusive right to prevent third parties,
who do not have his consent, from the act of using that process, and from the act of using, offering for
sale, selling or importing for those purposes the product obtained directly by that process in India.
2
* * * * *]
49. Patent rights not infringed when used on foreign vessels, etc., temporarily or accidentally in
India.—
(1) Where a vessel or aircraft registered in a foreign country or a land vehicle owned by a person
ordinarily resident in such country comes into India (including the territorial waters thereof) temporarily
or accidentally only, the rights conferred by a patent for an invention shall not be deemed to be infringed
by the use of the invention—
(a) in the body of the vessel or in the machinery, tackle, apparatus or other accessories thereof, so
far as the invention is used on board the vessel and for its actual needs only; or
(b) in the construction or working of the aircraft or land vehicle or of the accessories thereof, as
the case may be.
(2) This section shall not extend to vessels, aircraft or land vehicles owned by persons ordinarily
resident in a foreign country the laws of which do not confer corresponding rights with respect to the use
of inventions in vessels, aircraft or land vehicles owned by persons ordinarily resident in India while in
the ports or within the territorial waters of that foreign country or otherwise within the jurisdiction of its
courts.
1. Subs. by Act 38 of 2002, s. 25, for section 48 (w.e.f. 20-5-2003).
2. The proviso omitted by Act 15 of 2005, s. 36 (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
28
50. Rights of co-owners of patents.—
(1) Where a patent is granted to two or more persons, each of
those persons shall, unless an agreement to the contrary is in force, be entitled to an equal undivided share
in the patent.
(2) Subject to the provisions contained in this section and in section 51, where two or more persons
are registered as grantee or proprietor of a patent, then, unless an agreement to the contrary is in force,
each of those persons shall be entitled, by himself or his agents, to 1[the rights conferred by section 48]
for his own benefit without accounting to the other person or persons.
(3) Subject to the provisions contained in this section and in section 51 and to any agreement for the
time being in force, where two or more persons are registered as grantee or proprietor of a patent, then, a
licence under the patent shall not be granted and a share in the patent shall not be assigned by one of such
persons except with the consent of the other person or persons.
(4) Where a patented article is sold by one of two or more persons registered as grantee or proprietor
of a patent, the purchaser and any person claiming through him shall be entitled to deal with the article in
the same manner as if the article had been sold by a sole patentee.
(5) Subject to the provisions contained in this section, the rules of law applicable to the ownership
and devolution of movable property generally shall apply in relation to patents; and nothing contained in
sub-section
(1) or sub-section
(2) shall affect the mutual rights or obligations of trustees or of the legal
representatives of a deceased person or their rights or obligations as such.
(6) Nothing in this section shall affect the rights of the assignees of a partial interest in a patent
created before the commencement of this Act.
51. Power of Controller to give directions to co-owners.—
(1) Where two or more persons are
registered as grantee or proprietor of a patent, the Controller may, upon application made to him in the
prescribed manner by any of those persons, give such directions in accordance with the application as to
the sale or lease of the patent or any interest therein, the grant of licences under the patent, or the exercise
of any right under section 50 in relation thereto, as he thinks fit.
(2) If any person registered as grantee or proprietor of a patent fails to execute any instrument or to do
any other thing required for the carrying out of any direction given under this section within fourteen days
after being requested in writing so to do by any of the other persons so registered, the Controller may,
upon application made to him in the prescribed manner by any such other person, give directions
empowering any person to execute that instrument or to do that thing in the name and on behalf of the
person in default.
(3) Before giving any directions in pursuance of an application under this section, the Controller shall
give an opportunity to be heard—
(a) in the case of an application under sub-section
(1), to the other person or persons registered as
grantee or proprietor of the patent;
(b) in the case of an application under sub-section
(2), to the person in default.
(4) No direction shall be given under this section so as to affect the mutual rights or obligation of
trustees or of the legal representatives of a deceased person or of their rights or obligations as such, or
which is inconsistent with the terms of any agreement between persons registered as grantee or proprietor
of the patent.
1. Subs. by Act 38 of 2002, s. 26, for “make, use, exercise and sell the patented invention” (w.e.f. 20-5-2003).
29
52. Grant of patent to true and first inventor where it has been obtained by another in fraud of
him.—
(1) 1[Where the patent has been revoked under section 64] on the ground that the patent was
obtained wrongfully and in contravention of the rights of the petitioner or any person under or through
whom he claims, or, where in a petition for revocation, the 2[ 3*** court], instead of revoking the patent,
directs the complete specification to be amended by the exclusion of a claim or claims in consequence of
a finding that the invention covered by such claim or claims had been obtained from the petitioner,
the 2[ 3*** court] may, by order passed in the same proceeding, permit the grant to the petitioner of the
whole or such part of the invention which the 2[ 3*** court] finds has been wrongfully obtained by the
patentee, in lieu of the patent so revoked or is excluded by amendment.
(2) Where any such order is passed, the Controller shall, on request by the petitioner made in the
prescribed manner grant to him:—
(i) in cases where the 2[ 3*** court] permits the whole of the patent to be granted, a new patent
bearing the same date and number as the patent revoked;
(ii) in cases where the 2[ 3*** court] permits a part only of the patent to be granted, a new patent
for such part bearing the same date as the patent revoked and numbered in such manner as may be
prescribed:
Provided that the Controller may, as a condition of such grant, require the petitioner to file a new and
complete specification to the satisfaction of the Controller describing and claiming that part of the
invention for which the patent is to be granted.
(3) No suit shall be brought for any infringement of a patent granted under this section committed
before the actual date on which such patent was granted.
53. Term of patent.—4[
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the term of every patent granted,
after the commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, and the term of every patent which has
not expired and has not ceased to have effect, on the date of such commencement, under this Act, shall be
twenty years from the date of filing of the application for the patent.]
5
[Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, the term of patent in case of International
applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty designating India, shall be twenty years from the
international filing date accorded under the Patent Cooperation Treaty.]
(2) A patent shall cease to have effect notwithstanding anything therein or in this Act on the
expiration of the period prescribed for the payment of any renewal fee, if that fee is not paid within the
prescribed period 6[or within such extended period as may be prescribed].
7
* * * * *
8
[
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, on cessation of
the patent right due to non-payment of renewal fee or on the expiry of the term of patent, the subject
matter covered by the said patent shall not be entitled to any protection.]
CHAPTER IX
PATENTS OF ADDITION
54. Patents of addition.—
(1) Subject to the provisions contained in this section, where an
application is made for a patent in respect of any improvement in or modification of an invention
described or disclosed in the complete specification filed therefor (in this Act referred to as the “main
invention”) and the applicant also applies or has applied for a patent for that invention or is the patentee in
respect thereof, the Controller may, if the applicant so requests, grant the patent for the improvement or
modification as a patent of addition.
1. Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 37, for “Where a patent has been revoked” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
2. Subs. by s. 37, ibid., for “court” (w.e.f. 2-4-2007).
3. The word “Appellate Board” omitted by Act 33 of 2021, s. 13 (w.e.f. 4-4-2021).
4. Subs. by Act 38 of 2002, s. 27, for sub-section
(1) (w.e.f. 20-5-2003).
5. The Explanation ins. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 38 (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
6. Subs. by s. 38, ibid., for “or within that period as extended under this section” (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
7. Sub-section
(3) omitted by s. 38, ibid. (w.e.f. 1-1-2005).
8. Ins. by Act 38 of 2002, s. 27 (w.e.f. 20-5-2003).
30
(2) Subject to the provisions contained in this section, where an invention, being an improvement in
or modification of another invention, is the subject of an independent patent and the patentee in respect of
that patent is also the patentee in respect of the patent for the main invention, the Controller may, if the
patentee so requests, by order, revoke the patent for the improvement or modification and grant to the
patentee a patent of addition in respect thereof, bearing the same date as the date of the patent so revoked.
(3) A patent shall not be granted as a patent of addition unless the date of filing of the 1[application]
was the same as or later than the date of filing of the 1[application] in respect of the main invention.
2
[
(4) A patent of addition shall not be granted before grant of the patent for the main invention].
55. Term of patents of addition.—
(1) A patent of addition shall be granted for a term equal to that
of the patent for the main invention, or so much thereof as has not expired, and shall remain in force
during that term or until the previous cesser of the patent for the main invention and no longer:
Provided that if the patent for the main invention is revoked under this Act, the court, or, as the case
may be, the Controller, on request made to him by the patentee in the prescribed manner, may order that
the patent of addition shall become an independent patent for the remainder of the term for the patent for
the main invention and thereupon the patent shall continue in force as an independent patent accordingly.
(2) No renewal fees shall be payable in respect of a patent of addition, but, if any such patent
becomes an independent patent under sub-section
(1), the same fees shall thereafter be payable, upon the
same dates, as if the patent had been originally granted as an independent patent.
56. Validity of patents of addition.—
(1) The grant of a patent of addition shall not be refused, and a
patent granted as a patent of addition shall not be revoked or invalidated, on the ground only that the
invention claimed in the complete specification does not involve any inventive step having regard to any
publication or use of—
(a) the main invention described in the complete specification relating thereto; or
(b) any improvement in or modification of the main invention described in the complete
specification of a patent of addition to the patent for the main invention or of an application for such a
patent of addition,
and the validity of a patent of addition shall not be questioned on the ground that the invention ought to
have been the subject of an independent patent.
(2) For the removal of doubts it is hereby declared that in determining the novelty of the invention
claimed in the complete specification filed in pursuance of an application for a patent of addition regard
shall be had also to the complete specification in which the main invention is described.
CHAPTER X
AMENDMENT OF APPLICATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS
57. Amendment of application and specification before Controller.—
(1) Subject to the provisions
of section 59, the Controller may, upon application made under this section in the prescribed manner by
an applicant for a patent or by a patentee, allow the application for the patent or the complete
specification 3[or any document relating thereto] to be amended subject to such conditions, if any, as the
Controller thinks fit:
Provided that the Controller shall not pass any order allowing or refusing an application to amend an
application for a patent or a specification 3[or any document relating thereto] under this section while any
suit before a court for the infringement of the patent or any proceeding before the High Court for the
revocation