As per case facts, Ajmera Realty and Nikhil Shah initially agreed to redevelop a property. When redevelopment became unfeasible, they opted to sell it, with Ajmera investing significant sums to ... vacate tenants and sharing proceeds. LOUs stipulated Shah depositing title deeds with Ajmera and 16% interest on Ajmera's payments. Shah later disputed the LOUs, claimed they expired, and stated he intended to self-develop the property, assuring the court he'd pay Ajmera first. Ajmera filed an application (IA 5864) alleging Shah wasn't proceeding with self-development or sale. The High Court had to intervene due to Shah's inconsistent conduct, substantial financial exposure for Ajmera, and Shah's failure to deposit title deeds as contracted, raising concerns about potential alienation. The question arose on how to balance Ajmera's contractual rights and financial security against Shah's fluctuating claims and purported intention to self-develop. Finally, the court found a strong prima facie case for the LOUs' validity and Ajmera's risk. It ordered Shah to deposit all original title deeds for the property with the Court Receiver within two weeks. Shah can retrieve these deeds to pursue self-development only if he first deposits all amounts due to Ajmera under the LOUs, including contracted interest, into Court, after verification by the Taxing Master. This order secures Ajmera's investment while acknowledging Shah's right to develop.