As per case facts, two CBI cases were registered for cyber frauds involving large-scale money laundering where innocent citizens were duped through investment/job scams. Money was siphoned via mule accounts ... and overseas fintech platforms (PYYPL) to acquire cryptocurrency. The DoE initiated a PMLA investigation, identifying the accused/applicants as part of an organized syndicate (Bijwasan Group) operating these mule accounts and laundering over Rs. 65 crores. Allegations include destroying electronic evidence, assaulting DoE officers, and bribing local police. The accused sought anticipatory bail, but DoE opposed it, citing the stringent twin conditions of Section 45 PMLA and the need for custodial interrogation due to ongoing investigation and new complaints. The question arose as to whether anticipatory bail should be granted given the complex, transnational nature of money laundering offenses, the alleged obstruction of justice, and the need for further investigation. Finally, the court dismissed both applications, finding no reasonable grounds to believe the accused were not guilty or would not commit further offenses. It stressed the importance of custodial interrogation for unearthing the intricate crime layers and evidence, considering the serious allegations against the accused.