Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
The Bar Council of India challenges the
judgments of the High Court of Allahabad in two Writ
Petitions holding that the appointment of respondent No.
5 in these appeals as the Principal of
...the Dayanand
College of Law was valid and within the competence of the
State of Uttar Pradesh and the Chhatrapati Shri Sahu Ji
Maharaj Kanpur University, Kanpur. Respondent No. 5
was appointed Principal of the said Law College on
11.12.1995. On an inspection, the Bar Council of India
found that respondent No. 5 did not possess a
qualification in law and hence withdrew its recognition to
the College. At that stage, the Management of the College
filed Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 48183 of 2000
questioning the validity of the appointment of respondent
No. 5 as the Principal of the College.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....