land law, irrigation law
 26 Aug, 2025
Listen in 02:00 mins | Read in mins
EN
HI

Bharathi Vs. The Special Deputy Collector, (Rajiv Lift Irrigation Scheme-Phase-II, Pebbair.

  Telangana High Court 785 OF 2025
Link copied!

Case Background

As per case facts, this appeal was filed against a Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 concerning land acquisition. The appellants sought enhancement of market value. The legal question was whether ...

Hello! How can I help you? 😊
Disclaimer: We do not store your data.
Document Text Version

[ 34s01

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

73

747

LAND ACOUISITIONFIRST APPEAL NO: 728 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.204 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

1 7

Yadaiah, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

.Respofr denURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri.VManoharRao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

D

78F

'

Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in o.p.No.136 of 20i5 on the fire of the court of the senior civir

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

D.Radha, Wo.Laxmanna, Age 41 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lrrigatlon Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 730 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

'10.03.2016 in O.P.No.210 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

J. Gouthami @ Jyoti, D/o. Prasad, Age 30 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o

Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, LA, Raiiv Lift lrrigation Scheme -Phase- ll,

Pebbair.

...RespJndenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

'

Appeal under Section 54 of L'A'Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.184 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

,|

D

Between:

Yenamma, D/o.Naganna, Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

_Village

of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 732 Ot 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

't0.03.2016 in O.P.No.246 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Buddamma, Wo.Yellanna, Age 71 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally

VillageofKothakotaMandal,WanaparthyDistrict. ...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

'

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 733 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

'10.03.2016

in O.P.No.240 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

1Chandraiah. S/o.Naoanna. Ag.e 56 years,_Occ: Agriculture R/o. Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota-Mandit, Wanap'artfry'Oisiiici '

-- --'-

J.Naveen, S/o.Narsimha. eoe.44 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Maniat,-Wanap'artfiy Ois-tirct.

''' --''-''

...Appellants/Claimants

2

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenUResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

D

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P. No.174 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy

Between:

Ramulu, S/o.Chandraiah, Age 37 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

a

D FI F

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.182 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy

Between

N.Naqanna, D/o.Balaiah, Age 56 years, Occ' Agri

rotiiirota Mandal, Wanapahhy District

D

...Ap

Village of

laimant

culture, Kana

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair'

...RespondenUResPondent

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

:736

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

'10.03.2016 in O.P.No.203 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Naresh, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 37 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

..RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

l:lTiE NO:7

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.135 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

,

Rani, D/o.Narsimlu, Age 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

ANO

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-il, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar.Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals

D

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 738 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.178 of 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Elishamma, D/o.Karrenna, Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

ACtstTtoN FtT APP

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.21 1 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

, Age 48 Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o

J. Chinna Kurmaiah, S/o. Yerra Kistanna

Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Distric,

..AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll' Pebbair

enURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:740oF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.207 ot 2015 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

J. Balaiah, S/o.Chinna Kistanna, Age 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthi District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift Irrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri.VManoharRao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:741 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.140 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between

!_(ej?qrl, Q/o.Naganna,

Age 46_years, Occ. Agricutture, Kajayapa|y Viilage of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanapahhy Di'strict.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift Irrigation Scheme-phase_ll, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appeltant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals

T APPEAL NO: 742F

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

't0.03.20'16

in O.P.No.200 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Narender, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age

R/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal,

43 years, Occ. Agriculture,

Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACOUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 743 OF 202s

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O. P. No.134 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civit

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

J.Nagamma, Wo.Narsimlu, Age 6'l years, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kolhakota Mandal. Wanaparthy District. I

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair'

...ResPondenUResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 744 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.243 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Chittemma, Wo.Premaiah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of.Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 745 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.206 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Kranthi Kumar, S/o.Balaiah, Age 28 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. I

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

... RespgndenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals

LAND AUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 746oF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'175 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

R. Venkatamma, W/o. Edanna, Age 61 years, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUCIaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase -ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEALNOi]47 0F 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.248 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

Between:

Ravi, S/o. Yellanna, r Age 43 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll' Pebbair

...ResPondenUResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri' V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

'

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'172 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Balamma, Wo.Ashanna, Age 81 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

.AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

.RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. v Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.245 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Venkatesh, S/o.Kurmanna,

Village of Kothakota Mandal,

Age 30 years, Occ: Agricultur-e, R/o.Kanayapally

Wanaparthy Diskict. I

...AppellanUClaimant

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair

Respondent.

...ResionclenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

SITION FIRST APPEAL

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.168 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Manemma, W/o.Balaiah, Age 71 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

D NFI APPEAL N71

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20't6 in O.P.No. 180 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Shantha, D/o. Karrenna, Age 36 years, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ,.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair.

RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel forthe Respondent : GP for Appeals

n

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.133 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

J-Mashannq, S/o.Balaiah, Age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, LA. Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair,.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.205 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Shanthamma, Wo.Balaiah,

Village of Kothakota Mandal,

Age 55 years, Occ. Agriculturg, R/o.Kanayapally

Wanaparthy District. I

...AppellanUCIaimant

AND

The special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-phase-ll, pebbair

Respondent

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appeltant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals

*

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 754 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'183 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Dass, S/o.Naganna, Age 42 yeas, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri.VManoharRao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACOUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 755 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No. 171 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Chandra Babu, S/o.Balaiah

of Kothakota Mandal, Wana

, Age 34 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

parthy District. .,

...AppellanUClaimant

TheSpecialDeputycollector,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme-Phase-ll,Pebbair.

...RespondenUResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 756 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.247 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair

...RESPONDENTS

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 757 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.179 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Ramulu, S/o. Yellanna, Age 49 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict.

Raiani, D/o.Satyanna, Age 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Koihakota Manrial, Wanaparthy District. I

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

Respondent.

...ResdondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 758 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.238 of 20't5 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Manemma, Wo.Kondanna, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

counser for the Apperant : sri. v Manohar *ro

"'*""oondenuRespondent

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LANo AcQUlSlTlOlfFlRSJ APPEAL NO: 7ss OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.'191 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Ramesh, S/o.Naganna, Age 36 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Depug Collector, LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Aase-ll, Pebbair.

...ReFpondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20t6 in O.P.No.251 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

J.Murali, S/o.Savaraiah, Age 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

o

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

'10.03.2016 in O.P.No.26l of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

a

Shanthamma, Wo. Pedda Ramulu, Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

. The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeais

ON FI

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.197 of 20'15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between

Naresh, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiqh, Age 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanafarthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

ITION F NO:

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.185 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between

Bala Manemma, Wo.Venkataiah, Age 46 years, Occ.Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Didtrict.

-

.,

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...ResPondenUResPondent

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 764 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.250 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Venu, S/o.Savaraiah, Age 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

fhe Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counselfor the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 765 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.190 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

J.Naganna, S/o.Balaiah, Age 71 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

... RespondenUResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO.766 0F 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.193 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Renuka, D/9 Nqgpllr.a, Age

.341e9p,

occ. Agricutture, Kanayapaily Viilage of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals

LAND UISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: oF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10-03.2016 in O.P.No.264 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

S.u.brahmaly?m, S/o.chandr?i?h, Age..41 years, occ- Agricfiture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-il, pebbair.

... RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: L68 OF 20:E

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'198 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Narender, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 38 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

.RespondenuResponent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri.VManoharRao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 769 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.258 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Mahender, S/o. Yellanna, Age 46 year, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. I

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Speciat Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair.

.RespondenUResponent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

PEA

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

'10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.256 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Ramachandraiah, S/o.Yellanna, Age 56

_years,

Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair.

counser for the Appeflant : Sri. v Manohar Rao

"'RespondenuRespondent

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

DAC RST

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.263 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Buchamma, Wo.Chandraiah, Age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

-

.)

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector LA, Rajiv Lift trrigation Scheme-phase-il, pebbair.

,

...Respondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAAutsONIRS

Between:

AND

P o72 205

L

Appeal under Section 54 of L'A Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.262 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaParthY'

Salamma, Wo.Pedda Ramulu, Age

.f6 J.e?JS.l

Occ' Agriculture' Kanayapally

Viirii" o?'roinlkota Mandal, wanaparthy District'

...AppetlanUClaimant

Appeal under Section g of L'A'Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.249 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme LA Phase ll Pebbair'

Respondent

...RespondenUResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri' V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LANDACQUtSITIONFIRSTAPPEALNO:773oF 202s

Between:

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair

...RespondenUResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri' V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

J.Chinna Savaraiah,

-S/o.Navuraiah,

AO-e 7-8. ye.ap' Occ Agriculture' Kanayapally

Vi il";il ; K;ifiri"ia tvt a no a t, Wa n aparthv D i stri ct'

...AppellanUClaimant

I

:

LAND ACOUISITIONFIRST APPEAL NO: 774 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.252 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

J.Narsimha, S/o.Mashanna, Age 66 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 775 OF 202s

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O P.No.254 of 20'15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Betureen:

Mahesh, S/o. Narsimha, Age 31 years, Occ- Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. I

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll,

pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

ON FI AP o

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.265 of 20'15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Gangamma, Wo.Yellanna, Age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-'l 1, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 777 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.192 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Kishore, S/o. Naganna, Agq.34_yeqr9, Occ Agriculture, KaSayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 778 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20't6 in O.P.No.260 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

K. Pedda Ramulu, S/o. Naganna, Age 66 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

.Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACOU ON FIRST APPEAL NO| 779 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.266 ol 2015 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

9aroja,

Wo.Krishnaiah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. |

-

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift trrigation Scheme-phase-lt, pebbair.

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 780 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.267 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Maddileti,, S/o.Yellanna, Age 41 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair

Respondent

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 781 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.199 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Yadaiah, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 36 years, Occ. Agridlture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

rhe speciar Deputy corrector, Raiiv Lift rrrisation *.::::;#rf*""ojjiro*,

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

Ramesh, S/o. Narsimha, Age 36 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

.Kothakota

Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellanuclaimant

AND

LAND ACQUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 782 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.253 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel forthe Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 783 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.181 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

J. S. Chandraiah (died), Per LRs.2 to 6

J. Bhagyamma, w/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 63 years,

J. Naganna, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 49 years,

..

J. Sayanna, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 43 years,

J. Danaiah, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 39 years,

Chittemma, d/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 38 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ryo

Kanayapally Village, Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict.

..Appellants/Claimants

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

1

2

3

4

5

6

LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 784 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.208 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Ravi Kumar, S/o.Balaiah, Age 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

LAND ACQUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 785 OF 2025

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.194 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

Between:

Bharathi, D/o.Naganna, Age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,

...AppellanUGlaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, (Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

... RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao

Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals

The Court delivered the following:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

Nos. 728729730731 7 736

737.738.739.74o, 74L. 742. 743. 744. 745.746,747,74A.

749.750. 751.752, 753, 754, 755. 756. 757.758, 759,760.

76L, 762. 763.764, 765, 766, 767, 768.. 769,779-7JL,772,

773.774.775.776, 777. 778. 779.78,0. 791782,783, 78,4

1

and 785F 20.25.

COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Abhinand" Kumar Shauili)

When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned

counsel appearing for the appellants had informed the

Court that the issue involved in the present Appeals is

squarely covered by the common judgment, dated

29.O4.2025,.rendered ,,by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.57 of

2024 & batch and following the said common judgrnent,

the present Appeals also deserves to be allowed.

*

2. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals altpearing

for the respondent-Special Deputy Collector did not

dispute the said fact.

3. In view of the same, all these appeals are allowed

following the common judgment, dated 29.o4.2o2s,

rendered by this court in L.A.A.s.No.57 of 2024 & batch,

\

-a\

1i

and the market value is enhanced by two more times (l+21

than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with

all consequential benefits. However, it is made clear that

the appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay

period in preferring the appeals. There shall be no order

as to costs

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand

closed

//TRUE COPY/

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTR.AR

SECTION OFFICER

/

6

To,

2. One

3. Two

4. Two

Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. (With records, if

3ny)

CC to Sri. V Manohar Rao Advocate [OPUC]

-

ccs to GP for Appeals, High court for the State of Telangana. [ouT]

CD Copies

DUPSL

HIGH COURT

DATED:261AA2025

COMMON JUDGMENT

ALLOWING ALL THE APPEALS

,

q

v

r.fl

ar

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

rror*'nue sMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEvI EADA

L.A.A.S.Nos.57, 8L and 124 OF 2024

COMMON JUDGMENTi

(PerHon'bh

Justicc

Abbiuttd Kmar Shaik)

$7hen the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel

appearing for the appellants had informed this Court that the issue

raised in these Appeals is squarely covered by the

iudgmenq

dated

27.01,.2025, passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024.

Learned counsel had further contended that L.A.A.S.No.49 of

2024 was filed by claimant No.26 in O.P.No.91 of 201.4, dated

03.1,0.20'18 and the appellants herein

^re

other claimants in

O.P.No.91 of 201,4. Therefore, similar order be passed in these

I

appeals also. I earned counsel had further contended that IAAS

No.49 of 2OZ+ was disposed of by relying on a Division Bench

fudgment of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201.5 and batch,

dated 27.09.2022, whereby the market value of the land acquired

therein was enhanced by two more times than the value fixed by

the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits,

l':

2

however, for the delay period in preferring the appeals, the

claimants are not entitled for any interest.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants had further contended

that the judgment, dated 27.09.2022 passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of

201,5 and batch uras also confirmed by the Apex Court in

S.L.P.(Civil)No.28925 of 2024, dated 1.7.09.2024. Therefore, the

present appeals can also be disposed of in terms of the judgment,

dated 27 .01.2025 passed in L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the 1.,

respondent-Land Acquisition Officer had contended that the

purpose of acquiring lands of appellants is for Ryalampadu

)

Balancing Reservoir under

Jawahzr Uft Irrigation Proiect and

Priyadarshi

Jurala Project and G.O.Ms.No.234, dated 1,5.1,0.1,993

and G.O.NIs.No.291, dated 05.08.1982 arc not applicable to the

said irrigation projects. Therefore, al). the appeals are liable to be

dismissed.

,Eil};ii*r.i : .

n

J

4. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned

counsel on either side, this Court is of the view that the Division

Bench of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.2 of 201.6, dated 27.09.2022

aird L.A.A.S.No.4 of 201,6, dated 1,5.09.2022 held that the said

G.Os. are applicable for all the Irrigation Proiects, and though the

said G.Os. wefe issued specifically for Srisailam Hydro Power

Projects. L.A.A.S.No.1,25 of 201,5 and batch, dated 27.09.2022

and L.A.A.S.No.4 of 201,6,dated 1,5.09.2022were allowed and the

market value was enhanced by nvo more times than the value fixed

by the Land Acquisition Officer. Aggrieved by the order, dated

27.09.2022, rn L.A.A.S.No.1.25 of 2015 and batch, the State has

carried the matter to the Apex Court by filing S.L.P.(Civil).No.

,

28925 of 2024 and the Apex Court uide.otder, dated 17.09.2024,

confirmed the order passed by the Division Bench of this court in

L.A.A.S.N o.1,25 of 201.5 and batch. Therefore, the

Present

appeals

can also be disposed of in tefms of the iudgment,

dated

27.09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.1 25 of 201.5 and batch'

4

5. Accordingly, all the appeals are allowed by following the

judgment, dated 27.09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and

batch, and the market'alue is enhanced by rwo more times (1+z)

than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer with all

consequential benefits. However, the appellants are not entitled for

interest for the delay period in preferring the appeals. There shall

be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petirions, if any,pending in these appeals shall

stand closed.

JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

JUSTICE TIRUMAI.A DEVI EADA

Date:29.04.2025

Note:

R.grrtr,' ro annex copy of the

judgment dated 27.09.2022

In LAAS No.125 of 2015.

(B.o)

rkk/Prat

)

(

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LANDACOUI APPEAL SUlT NO: 728 OFm2B

Yadaiah, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll,

Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.204 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

)

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgm'ent and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

To,

7,/'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

//TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

DL/PSL

I

-l-.*'---:ia

r{

af,j

B

,{;

!:i l

.,

t

HIGH COURT

DATED:26108/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 728 OF 2025

t

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONO

THE HONOU

LE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

ANO

RABLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 729 OF 2O2s

D.Radha, Wo.Laxmanna, Age 41 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.136 ot 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy'

2. Two CD CoPies

DL/PSL

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

*

,)

n

.F

-:ri:+ir-r

Akl

t, -:

w

I

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO:729 OF 2O2s

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

uil=Frfft

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 73o OF 202s

Between:

J. Gouthami @ Jyoti, D/o. Prasad, Age 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri/o.

Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

The Special Deputy Collector , LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme -Phase- ll,

Pebbair.

RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.210 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

',

This appeal coming on for hearing and. upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2.

that

the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fiked by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3.

'lJhat

appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/.K.SRINIVASA

JOINT REGI

SECTION OFFICER

6

To,

'1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

,

f-,r!Yf

r-

$Fj

B

a

'1

,,

L;

t

,r

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 730 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

)

\.^

t(

+t'

(

\-

jelayqa. D/o.Naganna, Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

-

...App-etianuCtairiant

AND

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 731 OF 202s

Between:

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-phase-ll,

pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.184 ot 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and tht material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

,

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be.noorderasto costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

#

,

,,,

t

1F-?', t?

.{at

.

..4.

s

n

d"&'

w

,t

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:26 t}Bt2o2s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 731 OF 2O2S

.A

,

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,\

INTHEHIGHcoURTFoRTHESTATEoFTELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

NruO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

iUe nOUOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

NO F

Between

Buddamma, w/o.Yellanna, Age 71

.yealq,. 99c

Agriculture, FI/o'Kanayapally

Vill"G of X6tatota Mandal, Wanaparthy District'

...ApPellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair'

...RespondenUResPondent

' Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016ino.P.No.246of2015onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusilg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V ft/lanohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2 than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequential benefits:

3.Thatappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shatl be no order as to costs'

ri

t'

i

;

I

i

I

I

I

I

!

i

t

,/-

//TRUE COPY//

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

&

a

,|

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 732OF 202s

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR-TIIE.STATE

OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH

-D_AY

OJ AYGUST

. ---

TWO THOUSAND

AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI

AND

.THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTtcevIxtTIRAMAKRiSHNAREDDY

Between:

1

91;3[:'3li[,i:?]Btftll3;f$fi"1?

'iff;'ro,s,?:agricurture

Fuo Kanavaparrv

2. J.Naveen, S/o'Narsimha' -

age 44 yqa'r: Both Occ"

'

Agriculture'

R/o. Kanaya paily viltage ot rotfi x[ota iili ano'at' w anaparthy District'

...APPellants/Claim

ants

AND

TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme-Phase.ll,Pebbair.

...ResPondenUResPondent

AppealunderSection54ofL'A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03'2016ino.P.No.240of2ol5onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil

Judge, at WanaParthY' I

Thisappealcomingonforhearinganduponperusingthegroundsof

appeal,theJudgmentandDecreeoftheCourtbelowandthematerialpapersin

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri' V Manohar Rao' Advocate for the

appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' ' '

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the tVlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2 than the value

fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withaltconsequentialbenefits;

3. That appellants be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

(.-

To,

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

SD/-K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

G//TRUE COPYII

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

SECTION OFFICER

c-

,

i

I

!

I

i

t

.{

flffi

5 I

:r-

e.

ap-

w

"6...

' : l*:I;:

,:|

l-i:7

,

'tl

f"

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:26 tOBtzO2S

DECREE

LAAS NO: 733 OF 2O2s

,

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

D

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 734OF 202s

Between:

Ramulu, S/o.Chandraiah, Age 37 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.174 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusipg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with ail consequentiar benefits;

3' That apperrant be and hereby is not entired to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

\

-7

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

s

,

n f-qril*

,$i

w

:\

l

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26108/202s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 734 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

"{

a

tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAK]TI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 735OF 2025

Between:

N.Naganna, D/o.Balaiah , Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...APPELLANT(S)

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RESPONDENTS

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree

dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.182 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits:

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the deray period

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge atWanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

&

t

f'TT:

,{

sP"

w

: l"; -

'.i. /

a

s

f't

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 735 OF 2O2s

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION APPEAL SUlT NO: 736 OF 2025

Between:

Naresh, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 37 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair'

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.203 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the Senior civil

Judge, at WanaparthY.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in

the case and upon.hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not erititled to interest for the delay period

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

-----7

I

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

a

/TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

P

,

lt ^F',i-..:..:*t

$9

E#

*'

a

,

,:.,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26logl202s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 736 OF 2025

\

I

,

ALLOWING

THE APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT! RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 737 OF 2o2s

Rani, D/o.Narsimlu, Age 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

'

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'|35 ot 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusils the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court b.elow and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1 +2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That apperrant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the deray period

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFTCER

G

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

w

t

I

l,-J n

I

-tr-ir3-t"'+l

'..

,-1-

t'i

AP,

w

n

,

\

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 737 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

D

$

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY

D : 738 0F

Elishamma.

-Dlo.Karrenna,

Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair.

RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.178 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon p"rr.#g the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court bblow and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That apperrant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the deray period

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

To,

//TRUE COPY//

'l . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

I

n

I f.ojltl

e$

'1

"-&,

)

5*

C

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DEGREE

LAAS NO: 738 OF 2025

I

a

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

tD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION APPEAL SUlT NO: 738 OF 2025

il

Elishamma, D/o.Karrenna, Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.178 of 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon p"rr"#g the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court bblow and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all mnsequential benefits;

3' That appellant be and hereby is not entitred to interest for the deray period

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

&

,

-r.f".,l$t

n

,{8'

w

I

a

l.

I

:5i

$p,'

&

HIGH COURT

DATE D : 26 10812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 738 OF 2025

\

1\

,)

qn

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDOY

LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 739 OF 2025

Between:

J. Chinna Kurmaiah, S/o. Yerra Kistanna, Age 48 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.

Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.2'| 1 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruqhg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and uponhearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not erititled to interest for the delay period

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGTSTRAR

G

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

SECTION OFFICER

)

d

{

{p4{f ***l

*h

w

,4,

n

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 739 OF 2025

\

I

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY

LAND SUIT NO: 740 OF 2025

Between:

J. Balaiah, S/o.Chinna Kistanna, Age 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapatly

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

..RESPONDENTS

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.207 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perysing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: ,

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not'entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3363 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

F

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

d//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

sj.

,

d

t

-F',-'{ijs

-&

n

#

?

,i. ..

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 740 OF 2025

,

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 741 OF 2025

Between:

["jgnlr9, P/o.Naganna,

Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapalty Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift trrigation Scheme-phase-ll,

pebbair.

...Respondent/Respondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.140 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusftg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2' That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That apperant be and hereby is not eniitred to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

To,

DUPSL

//TRUE COPYII

The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

Two CD Copies

SD/.KSRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

G

SECTION

OFFICER

1

2

B!

,

I

.F-f-T:"*l

tq

ds'

w

,

r

j',l

, :,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 741 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

$

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILl

THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE

D

VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITIONAPPEAL SUIT NO: 742OF2025

Between:

Age 43 years, Occ.

ndal, Wanaparthy District.

Agriculture,

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll,

pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.20'16 in O.P.No.200 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusint the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

Narender, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah,

Rl/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Ma

//TRUE COPYII

SD/.KS-RINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

G

SECTION

OFFICER

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\P SL

w

I

^fi6E|?*t

'l

a*'

w

,$..

'

;i::i

t.

,;.

..*"1

I

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 742 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

d

,r/

I

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

TflE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITT RAMAKR]SHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUIsITION APPEAL SUIT NO:743 0F 2025

Between:

J.Nagamma, Wo.Narsimlu. Age 6.1

.years,

Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanapaithy Di6trict.'

...AppellanUGlaimant

AND

The special Deputy coilector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase-il, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

' Appear under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree

dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.134 ot 2015 on the fite of the court of the senior civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusingf the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (.t+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Ofiicer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That apperant be and hereby is not entit$d to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeat.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

E.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

G

SECTION OFFICER

To,

//TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD CoPies

DL/PSL

*y

,.

I

rF €fl?,&

,{

s

I

46 ,.

. )f

4

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:26lOBl2O25

DECREE

LAAS NO: 743 OF 2025

,

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

x

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYOERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LANDACQUISITIONAPPEAL SUIT NO:74/.OF 2025

Between:

Chittemma, Wo.Premaiah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair'

'

...ResPondenUResPondent

AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.243 0t 2015 0n the file of the court of the Senior civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusg;lg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court b.elow and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. rhatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3.Thatappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod

of 3357 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6//TRUE COPY//

To,

'1 .

.The

Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

8>

I

h"

a

t,t fu*gg'iii!

A$-

w

.14:

n

,

s

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 744 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

\\

I

T

i

n

I

i

t

\

$

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKR]SHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 745OF 2025

Between:

Kranthi Kumar, S/o.Balaiah, Age 28 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.206 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and th9 material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed bithe Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOTNT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

To,

//TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD CoPies

DUPSL

,

d

,*

d

w

.|;s -

i

,

";

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 745 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

)

!N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND :FIfItrNAPPEAL SUIT NO: 746 oF2025

R- Venkatamma, Wo. Ed?t'!!9, Age 61 years, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase -ll, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.175 of 20'15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGTSTRAR

G//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

SECTION OFFICER

NY

,

fr'ry8

.t

se'

ry

,!i

d

{

F

*

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26lOBl2O25

DECREE

LAAS NO: 746 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE

AND

INAND KUMAR SHAVILI

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

i 747

Ravi, S/o. Yellanna, rAge 43 years, Occ Agriculture, Fl/o. Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

.AppellanUClaimant

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.248 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

,

This appeal coming on for hearing and'upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

D

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

G

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

SECTION OFFICER

w

a

,rr--

d

n

AP,

lp

,

.h,

tj'r

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 747 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

I

5J

fr

\"r

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

D

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:744 OF 2025

Balamma, Wo.Ashanna, Age 81 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.172 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusipg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon ftearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the-Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

,7

//TRUE COPYII

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

SD/.KSRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

To,

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

s

,

"*q;;r":B$&*tl

r'i

,l

,1

w

",1_ I

i.'

.t

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:261081202s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 748 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

\

{

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOU APPEAL SUIT NO:749 OF 2025

Between:

Venkatesh, S/o.Kurmanna,

Village of Kothakota Mandal,

Age 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o.Kanayapally

Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

Respondent.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.245 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

I

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1 +2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1.. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

}D

,

d

.-. {:fii'}.

,'l

n

d,&

w

I

\

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 749 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

\,,

It

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

EAL

Between

Manemma, W/o.Balaiah, Age 71_.y99t9, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota'[Mandal, Wanaparthy District'

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

... RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.p.No.168 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

I

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

a

n

1

"?Fr-in:.e*{,

n

#i

w

,

'),

t

I

HIGH COURT

DATE D : 26 l,0&2025

DECREE

\1

LAAS NO: 750 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\'1F

,)

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTGE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

Between:

Shantha, D/o. Karrenna, Age 36 years, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 5t4 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree

dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.180 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusf,rg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

'

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed i

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not eniitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

g

a

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO:751 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

)

.,\'vr

rN rHE HIGH couRl{fl$JEIf"'iJE

oF TELANGANA

'"'=*r5;g1[lYnRlSH-K19E'OHou"

PRESENT

KUMAR

SHAVILI

STICE

ABHINAND

A REDDY

THE HONOURABLE

SRI JU

AND

AKITI

RA$TAKRISHN

THE HONOURABLE

SRI JUSTICE

v

Between:

i{yft :[s{}ffi,r",f

iflx: rtfl

f; iB,

],?ffi

'

o cc' As ri cu rtu re' Ka n ava

p arrv Vi*as e or

..'APPellanUClaimant

o*?,.'"

speciar Deputy co*ector, LA. Raiiv Lift lrrigation scheme-phase-lr,

pebbair''

...ResPondenUResPondent

AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.133 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil

Judge, at WanaParthY'

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusipg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri' V Manohar Rao' Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as followsi

I

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

ITTRUE

COPYII

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

sD/ Ki#XEt?Sr[lR

G

SECTION

OFFICER

To,

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

w

,

d <F fr*i.

+

sg

B

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 752 OF 2025

ALLOWING

THE APPEAL

,

t\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND 7

Between

Shanthamma, Wo.Balaiah,

virrige oi koihaiot" rvrinori,

Age 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally

Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

Respondent

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.205 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

,

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with afl consequentiar benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGTS

6

//TRUE COPY//

To,

'l . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

SECTION OFFICER

It

I

-,F',f:.kr

I

t

N;

Itr

.i..

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26l,0812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 753 OF 2025

ALLOWING

THE APPEAL

)

!

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH

.qAY

OF AUGUST

' "-""iiii

tHousnND AND TWENTY FlvE

PRESENT

THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI

AND

THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEVAKITIRAMAKRISHNAREDDY

Between:

ffiif;-:{:,U3fl 3:iit*??"X?ise,,,?,'.,:""

Asricurture' Kanavapa,v Virrage or

AppellanUClaimant

AND

TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme-Phase-ll,Pebbair.

"'ResPondenUResPondent

AppealunderSection54ofL.A'ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016ino.P.No.183of2015onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil

Judge, at WanaParthY'

Thisappealcomingonforhearinganduponperusf,rgthegroundsof

appeal,theJudgmentandDecreeoftheCourtb.elowandthematerialpapersin

thecaseanduponhearingtheargumentsofSri.VManoharRao,Advocateforthe

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

'

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

2,ThattheMarketvalueisenhancedbytwomoretimes(1+2 hanthevalue

fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

SD/-K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

6

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

w

)

t *"'try

'4

d'

w

n

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26|OB|2O25

DECREE

LAAS NO: 754OF 2025

ALLOWTNG THE APPEAL

I

h

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 755 OF 2025

Between:

Chandra Babu, S/o.Balaiah, Age 34 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.171 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusiryg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitted to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

---------7

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

w

i;.

I

,

t

^.'-?rif#it

-.'/:

{ii

?,p

.:{

n

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/202s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 755 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

)"1

t

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

, AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

ND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 7 F225

Between:

Ramulu, S/o. Yellanna, Age 49 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

ANO

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll,

pebbair

..RESPONDENTS

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.247 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirp the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (.1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That appe'ant be and hereby is not entired to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in preferring

the appeal.

4. Thal there shall be no order as to costs.

\

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGTSTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

D-

,.

t {--rff:rt8

,i

d"t'

Bs

n

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 756 OF 2025

ALLOVVING THE APPEAL

,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 757 OF 2025

Rajani, D/o.Satyanna, Age 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

ENT'

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

Respondent

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'|79 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

I

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That apperrant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

T]

--_-----

\

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

w

t

f.{r.e

-

^-:.4-

t

Ae'

tr

l.i

"

tl

's

,,

1

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 757 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

h

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAV]LI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

PRESENT

LAND AcUIITION FIT APPEAL NO: 780F 202s

Between:

Manemma, Wo.Kondanna. ASg 4g years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanapaithy Oi3tri"t.'

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The speciar Deputy coIector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation Scheme-phase-il, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10'03'2016 in o.P.No.238 of 201s on the fire of the court of the senior civir

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusin$ the grounds of

appear, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That appe'ant be and hereby is not entiaed to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in prefering

the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1.

.The

Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

,

I

I

f.q:F {E!

.&'

n

*fi

w

I

.?

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 758 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

rHE HoNouRABLE sRr rrr,tl?o^Fr RAMAKRT'HNA REDD'

D s P 7OF

fflilffXi,iil?lix! :flp 4:ir'rt',.",?rq

occ' As ricu rtu re, Ka na

va

pa uv Vi ua g e or

.AppellanUClaimant

The special Deputy collector, LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Aase_il, pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appear under section 54 0f L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10'03.2016 in o.p.No.191 0f 2015 0n the fire of the court of the Senior civir

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusingrthe grounds of

appear, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and Gp for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Mirket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That appe'ant be and hereby is not entired to interest for the deray period

of 3357 days in prefering

the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

o*

,,

1

-f'.if:':*-t

s,f,

w

)

:f

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 759 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

l'l

r,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRlrrtlis ABHINAND KUMAR sHAVlLl

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUIS]TION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 760 OF 2025

Between:

J.Murali, S/o.Savaraiah, Age 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The special Deputy collector, LA, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.251 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the Senior civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

,

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

&L

,

\

n

+-F-f,:Fiq

*ll

w

,1

n

,

9:

,jr

,/

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 760 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

q

t "-1

li,,l

"d

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL]

D

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOU FIRST APPEAL NO761 0F 2025

Between:

Shanthamma, Wo. Pedda Ramulu, Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll,

pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.261 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusipg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court bglow and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entiiled to interest for the deray period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

W

I

./

HIGH COURT

DATED:26108l,202s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 761 OF 2025

ALLOWING

THE APPEAL

,

I1

I

,

i

i

I

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI

AND

THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEVAKITIRAMAKRISHNAREDDY

F

Between

Naresh, S/o.Chinna Chinnailll, Age 44 y-ear-s'

Viii;#' bf Koinrrioti Ma ndal, w a naparthv Distri ct'

Occ. Agriculture, KanaYaPallY

..AppellanUClaimant

AND

The special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll'

Pebbair'

.. ResPondenUResPondent

AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.197 0l 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil

Judge, at WanaParthY'

Thisappealcomingonforhearinganduponperusingthegroundsof

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and/tne material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri' V Manohar Rao' Advocate for the

appellant and GF for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2.ThattheMarketvalueisenhancedbytwomoretimes(1+2)thanthevalue

fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is no-t entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

//TRUE COPYII

The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

SD/.KSRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6

To,

w

1

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

,

,i

)

It 'r.ri-?e

a

w

i:!

a

b,1

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 762 OF 2025

ALLOWING

THE APPEAL

i

I

I

I

I

,

\

.^

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 763 OF 2025

Between:

Bala Manemma, Wo.Venkataiah, Age 46 years, Occ.Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

'10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'|85 of 201 5 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusilg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

7

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6

a

"F:!41Y1.S8

tut'

B

,

d

;

"/

HIGH COURT

DATED:26lOOl2O25

DECREE

LAAS NO: 763 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

f

,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDE

TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 764 OF 2o25

Between:

Venu, S/o.Savaraiah, Age 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.250 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon p"rr.fig the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court bblow and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

To,

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

//TRUE COPYII

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

a

ll ^F',.ii?-jl.{

..'r-

d.rt

B

rl

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:261081202'

lIl{{ir{l

LAAS NO: 764OF 202s

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

li,1

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

Dus FI

.I

J.Naqanna, S/o.Balaiah, Age 71 years'

Kothikota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

.AppellanUClaimant

TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme.Phase-ll,Pebbair.

...RespondenUResPondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.190 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil

Judge, at WanaParthY.

I

This appeal coming on for hearing and. upon peruding the grounds of

appeal,theJudgmentandDecreeoftheCourtbelowandthematerialpapersin

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. Ihatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3.Thatappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

D

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOTNT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

w

,

.,

"f."-'tfpf*

I

I

',7

w

n

a'.

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 765 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

Between

Renuka, D/o.Naga1na, Age 34_years, occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair

... RespondenURes pondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.193 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy. p

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

&

.\

,

^rF,_f1r1gl

{

A&'

tr

a

.1,. ..

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/202s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 766 OF 2025

ALLOW]NG THE APPEAL

a

<\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND SITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO:767 0F 2025

Between:

s.u.brahmalyam, s/o-chandr?!?h, Age..41_years, occ- Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota tMandal, Wanapirtny Oistrici.

...AppellanUGlaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair.

. Res pondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.264 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusifig the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the t\4arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2)than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

7

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

t

!

&

I F.'':t+I

]

"b,

n

#

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 767 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

,)

tr

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND lstTtoN FrRsT APPEAL NOi 768 0F 2025

Between:

Narender, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 38

.years,

Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanapahhy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

D

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair.

.RespondenUResponent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.198 oI 2015 on the file of the court of the Senior civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

,

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal beand herbyisallowed;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

/TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy'

SD/.K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6

To,

2. Two CD CoPies

DL\PSL

w

,

-fF.dff.'*!

#i

w

I

n

,

I

,|

a

h

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 768 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

a

h

5\l

T,f

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 769 OF 2025

Between:

Mahender, S/o. Yellanna, Age 46 year, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota [t/andal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair.

... RespondenUResponent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.258 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusitg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decr.ee as follows: ,

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3360 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

C

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

W

I

4 -.:i-{e,

. t,'

n

*i::

tr

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 769 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 770 OF 2025

Between:

Ramachandraiah, S/o.Yellanna, Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

... RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.256 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusiig the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V l\Ianohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as fotlows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2)than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3360 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

I

SD'.K.SRINIVASA

RAO

--.

.IOIUT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

/TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy'

2. Two CD CoPies

DL\PSL

&

)

.F.rr..j?ri*l

....

s&'

tr

.t

n

..1

,,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 770 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITIONFIRST APPEAL NO: 771 OF 2025

Between:

Buchamma, W/o.Chandraiah, Age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...Respondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.263 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruslig the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to crsts.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGTSTRAR

SECTION OFFTCER

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

M

,)

t

t

.f5,?:;1*

#

n

. r.'

a

HIGH COURT

DATED:26108l,2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 771 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

*/1

r,\

,

P.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

'THE

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

sON FIRST APPEAL

years,

District.

Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Between

Salamma, Wo.Pedda Ramulu, Age 46

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme LA Phase ll Pebbair.

Respondent

... RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.262 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

,

This appeal coming on for hearing and. upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

/

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

*>

,,

.

.

!

i

li

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 772 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

)

.,l^

I

\

,r'

rN rHE HrGH couRlffl$rtfffJiJE

oF TELANGANA

r u Es DAY, r H EJ\^r

iNIt^i,'IH,KIf

F'OH

n

"t

Between:

PRESENT

JUSTICE

ABHINAND

KUMAR

SHAVILI

THE HONOURABLE

SRI

AND

RAMAKRISHNA

REDDY

THE HONOURABLE

SRl JUSTIGE

VAKITI

Occ. Agriculture'

KanaYaPallY

o*orn"

Speciar Deputy co*ector,

Raiiv Litt rrrigation

Scheme-phase-ll'

pebbair'

...ResPondenUResPondent

AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016

in o.p.No.24g of 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil

Judge, at WanaParthY'

Thisappealconringonforhearinganduponperusiigthegroundsof

appeal,theJudgmentandDecreeoftheCourtb.elowandthematerialpapersin

thecaseanduponhearingtheargumentsofSri.VManoharRao,Advocateforthe

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent'

{l?'lJ}S''^ilf,:?S['

S/o.Navuraiah'

Age 78 Years'

ffi;b; ; W an"PartnY

District'

..APPellanUGlaimant

This Court doth Order and Decree as followsi

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

limac t,t+9 thr

2.ThattheMarketvalueisenhancedbytwomoretimes(1+2)thanthevalue

fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the detay period

of 3360 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs'

'o':l8inflXEti+[f8

//TRUE

COPYII 6

SECTION

OFFICER

fO,

DL\PSL

1. The Senior

Civ

2' Two cD

"or,"l'Judge

at wanaParthy'

I

t

t

f-r,.lIB

2^.

!,':

n

*P:

w

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:261081202'

DECREE

LAAS NO: 773 OF 2025

ALLOW]NG THE APPEAL

,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 774 OF 2025

Between:

JNarsimha, S/o.Mashanna, Age 66 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota fMandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUCIaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair

... RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.252 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3360 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

/TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD CoPies

DL\PSL

)

l

I

..r--ifiiaa

d".it.

F

n

,

i.

t'

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 774 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

I

,-\-

rN rHE

HrGH

couRr

FS$"'I5f#JE

oF TELANGANA

ruEsD#6r+f#iNIYAillll'K19E'0Enu'*

THEHONOURABLE

PRESENT

sRr JusrlfiE

ABHTNAND

sRl JusTlcE

vAKlTl

KUMAR

SHAVILI

RAMAKRISHNA

REDDY

THE HONOURABLE

Occ-

Agriculture'

KanaYaPallY

Village

of

Between:

u3x.?'-:i,'{f, "sHfi

}fl;isf ibYi'ft

li:

o*orn"

special

Deputy

collector'

Raiiv

Lift lrrigation

ApPellanUClaimant

Scheme-

Phase-

ll' Pebbair'

..'ResPondenUResPondent

AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2010

in o.p.No.zs+

or 201s on *re file of ,n" co"t of the senior

civil

Judge,

at WanaparthY'

Thisappealcomingonforhearinganduponper8singthe.grouno':'

appear,

the JudgSnent

and Decree

of the cou* below and the material

papers ln

the case and upon hearing tn" arguments

o{ Sri. V Manohar

Rao' Advocate

for the

appellant

and GP for Appeals

for the Respondent'

This Court doth Order and Decree

as follows:

1 . That the appeal

be and herby is allowed

rnore times

(1+2) t

2.ThattheMarketvalueisenhancedbytwomoretimes(1+2)thanthevalue

fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer.withallconsequentialbenefits;

3.Thatappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod

of 3364 days in preferring the appeal'

4' That there shall be no order as to costs'

i

t:

t:

li

i

i

I

//TRUE

COPYII

"':i3i^flXEt?.^,[iS

G

SECflON

OFFICER

To,

DL\PSL

1. The Senior

Civ

2. Two cD

"or,"]'Judge

at wanaParthY'

*

,

\

n

{

d.F-if:...6_.

,t

e4'

w

"r-'

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610912025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 775 OF 202s

ALLOWING

THE APPEAL

)

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAV]LI

D

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI R,AMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISIiI'NRST LNOi7760F

Between:

Gangamma, Wo.Yellanna. ASg 7q.y9?T, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village

of Kothakota Mandal, Wanapaihy Diltrict.'

.AppellanUClaimant

The special Deputy coilector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase-1 1,

pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.265 of 2o1s on the file of the court of the senior civit

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusifg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed i

2. That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That appellant be and hereby is not entitied to interest for the deray period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

D

7

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

s-

,)

t'{

,tl

SF,

TP

t

HIGH COURT

DATED:26l,0U2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 776 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,.

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REODY

D ACOUISITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 777 OF 2025

Kishore, S/o. Naganna, Age 34 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.192 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

n

n

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

'1.

That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3364 days in preferring the appeal.

4. Thdt there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO *

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

a

{

-tT:{?"i!f

'. .. :::

A"8'

tp

,1

.n

,

!

HIGH COURT

DATED:26108l,2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 777 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

i

I

1

i

i

I

\

-I

ll

I

I

I

i

!

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO778 0F 2025

Between:

K. Pedda Ramulu, S/o.Naganna, Age 66 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenUResPondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.260 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaparthY.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirQ the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2'1than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitied to interest for the delay period

of 3364 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

C

//TRUE COPYII

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

.)

W

4r {r:P,{fi

{

,'{

s#

w

n

)

t

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 778 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,\N

.,

t1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

tue noruouRABLE sRt JUSTIcE vAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACQUISITTON FIRST APPEAL NO: 779 OF 2025

Between:

Saroja, Wo.Krishnaiah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

... RespondenURes pondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.266 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon p"rrEing the grounds

of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material

papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V f\4anohar

Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That ttiebppeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3364 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

:

:

i

?i

!l

l,t,

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

,

W

t

'i

.F.tfT'Fit

,*

ds'

&!{c/

w

.F,

,)

a

"/

F

HIGH GOURT

DATED:26

tO8l2O25

DECREE

LAAS NO: 779 OF 2025

ALLOWING

THE APPEAL

!

\

o

:

;

I

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

F

Between:

Maddileti, S/o.Yellanna, Age 41

Kothakota Mandal, WanaParthY

years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

Respondent

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.267 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at WanaparthY.

,

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V l\Ianohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA

RAO

---JOINT

REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6

To,

/TRUE COPY/

1. The Senior

Civil Judge at Wanaparthy'

2. Two

CD CoPies

DL\PSL

)

I

I

n

:t ii

'hs

.,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 780 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

a

-n IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 781 OF 2025

Between:

Yadaiah, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 36 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.199 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perudhg the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as followsi

'

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the tVlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

:

C

To,

1

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

//TRUE COPY//

The Senior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy

SECTION OFFICER

*

a

( {F.!i:-.+

Tj

._

/--

w

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/2025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 781 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

1

.,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI

AND

.THE

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY

FIRST

Between

Ramesh, S/o.Narsimha, Age 36 years, occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District

...AppeltanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.253 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon p"rusifig the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V lVlanohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the,appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entiileO to interest for the delay period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

il

-

-,

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

6

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

&

,

q.*fft

4,,

;

tl

,Il'.

**

X'Y

w

t

a

p

n

I

t

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 782 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

,)

Ll

hr

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

LAND A !SITION FIRSTAPPEAL NO: 783oF 2025

Between:

1. J. S. Chandraiah (died), Per LRs.2 to 6

2. J. Bhagyamma, w/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 63 years,

3. J. Naganna, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 49 years,

4. J. Sayanna, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 43 years'

5. J. Danaiah, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 39 years,

6. Chittemma, d/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 38 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.

Kanayapally Village, Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District'

...Appellants/Claimants

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

I

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.181 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perpsing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows:

1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3' That appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in prefering

the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

To,

//TRUE COPYII

The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA

RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

G

SECTION OFFICER

1

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

,)

-

W

n ^F. -f-::jtil

5

#

"{,

. ,;.,

)

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/08/202s

rr{f,.€i

LAAS NO: 783OF 2o2s

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

\

0

J.

l"

I

!

I

i

I

I

j

I

I

I

1

6

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

784

Between:

Ravi Kumar, s/o.Balaial,

.4g."

30 y.ear!, occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally

Village of Kothakota fMandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-tl, Pebbair.

... RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.208 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

I

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V lManohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed

;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all conseqLential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

*

,

"ry"ry.€!

_-z-'

.i'

rt

t\

A&'

w

. ..;tdj

I

\-,

a*

p

.f

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

DECREE

LAAS NO: 784 OF 2025

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

)

\

a.^ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

Between

Bharathi, D/o.Naganna, Age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of

Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special Deputy Collector, (Rajiv Lift trrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair.

...RespondenURespondent

Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.194 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil

Judge, at Wanaparthy.

,

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of

appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in

the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the

appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent.

This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with atl consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period

of 3358 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs.

7

li

I

//TRUE COPY//

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

G

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD Copies

DL\PSL

S.

,

HIGH COURT

DATED:26 tOBtZo2s

DECREE

LAAS NO: 785 OF z1zs

ALLOWING THE APPEAL

)

1

a

5rl

1.'r

Reference cases

Description

Legal Notes

Add a Note....