Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
According to the allegations levelled in the complaint, theappellant–Brij Lal and Mohan Lal - PW-15 were both employed in theIrrigation Department of the State Government. They were both holdingthe posts
...of Gauge Reader. They also resided in government quarters atSuleman-ki-Head, close to one another. The appellant–Brij Lal allegedlyused to hurl abuses at Mohan Lal - PW-15 under the influence of liquor.Some others, including Kashi Ram, co-accused, used to side with theappellant – Brij Lal, in his misbehaviour with Mohan Lal – PW-15. Inorder to settle the dispute amicably Mohan Lal – PW-15 called a“panchayat” (council). The endeavour of Mohan Lal – PW-15, throughthe panchayat, proved unsuccessful. Eventually, he addressed acommunication dated 18.8.1983, to the Assistant Engineer of theIrrigation
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....