As per case facts, a criminal case was initiated against seven accused for robbery of silver, gold, and cash from the complainant. During the investigation, ornaments were recovered from the ... accused, which the complainant identified. The trial court acquitted the accused due to benefit of doubt. The complainant's application under Section 457 CrPC for seized property was rejected. Subsequently, an application under Section 452 CrPC for property handover was also rejected by the Sessions Court, directing the appellant to civil suit, leading to this appeal. The question arose whether the Sessions Court's order declining the appellant's claim under Section 452 CrPC and directing a civil suit was legal and justified. Finally, the Court found the Sessions Court's order illegal and set it aside, directing the Sessions Court to hand over the seized property to the appellant's legal heirs under usual conditions.