As per case facts, the deceased went missing, and ransom demands were made from her mobile phone. The appellant later sold the deceased's mobile phone. The deceased's body and Scooty ... were subsequently recovered based on information provided by the appellant. Medical evidence confirmed a homicidal death. Both the Trial Court and High Court convicted the appellant for murder and destruction of evidence, relying on circumstantial evidence. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court, challenging these concurrent findings. The question arose whether the lower courts rightly convicted the appellant for murder based solely on the presented circumstantial evidence. Finally, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances that irresistibly pointed to the appellant's guilt, dismissing the appeal but granting liberty to apply for remission.