Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
Leave granted. Appellant and respondent are pharmaceutical
companies manufacturing various pharmaceutical products. The two
companies had taken over the assets and business of the erstwhile
Cadila Group after its restructuring under Sections 391
...& 394 of
the Companies Act. One of the conditions in the scheme of
restructuring of the Cadila Group was that both the appellant and
the respondent got the right to use the name CADILA as a
corporate name.
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....