As per case facts, the Petitioner, a Junior Fireman, was terminated for 92 days of unauthorized absence in 2001. He explained his absence by citing his mentally ill younger brother ... and dependent elderly parents. An inquiry found him guilty based on his admission, leading to termination. The Labour Court dismissed his challenge, and he filed a Writ Petition. The question arose whether the Labour Court erred in dismissing the reference, if prior antecedents were rightly considered, and if the punishment was proportionate. Finally, the Court found no error in the Labour Court's decision, affirming that dismissal was not disproportionate given the Petitioner's admitted misconduct and the hazardous nature of his duties, thus dismissing the Petition.