Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per the case facts a petition was filed under Section of the CrPC to challenge an order where a magistrate had taken cognizance of various offenses under the Indian
...Penal Code The High Court had issued directions for investigation or further investigation The matter came to the Supreme Court because the High Court's order for further investigation was challenged with arguments questioning the High Court's power to issue such specific directions to a magistrate or police The question arose regarding the scope of the High Court's power under Section of the CrPC to direct investigation further investigation or reinvestigation especially after a magistrate has taken cognizance or a chargesheet has been filed Finally the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal allowing the investigation contemplated by the impugned order to proceed to its logical end However it effaced certain unwarranted observations made by the High Court clarifying that the entire matter is left open for examination by the investigating agency sanctioning authority and the concerned court in accordance with the law without prejudice to any party due to the effaced observations