As per case facts, plaintiffs filed a suit to claim possession of land, challenging sale and mortgage deeds executed by their father, arguing it was ancestral property and transactions lacked ... legal necessity. The Trial Court sided with the plaintiffs, but the Lower Appellate Court reversed, stating the property was self-acquired as it was received via a Will, not survivorship. The plaintiffs then appealed to the High Court. The question arose whether the property in the father's hands could be considered ancestral property for the plaintiffs or if it was his self-acquired property, given the involvement of a Will in its inheritance. Finally, the High Court, citing Supreme Court judgments, ruled that property inherited through a Will from an ancestor becomes self-acquired for the recipient, losing its ancestral nature. Thus, the property was deemed the father's self-acquired property, and the plaintiffs had no inherent right to it.