Writ Petition, Andhra Pradesh High Court, contractor payments, vigilance inquiry, arbitrary action, Article 226, mandamus, payment release, PADA works
 31 Jul, 2026
Listen in 01:36 mins | Read in 37:30 mins
EN
HI

Dpraveen Kumar Reddy Vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

  Andhra Pradesh High Court 179/2025
Link copied!

Case Background

As per case facts, the Writ Petitioners, who are Civil Contractors, were assigned various contract works by the respondent authorities. They executed these works and submitted bills for payment. Despite ...

Hello! How can I help you? 😊
Disclaimer: We do not store your data.
Document Text Version

Date on which Order/Judgment was

reserved

:

13.07.2026

& 20.07.2026

Date on which Order/Judgment was

pronounced

:

31.07.2026

Date on which Order/Judgment was

uploaded on the website of the High

Court

:

31.07.2026

APHC010002512025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3327]

FRIDAY, THE 31

st

DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 179/2025, 29050 of 2024,

29079 of 2024, 29140 of 2024, 29134 of 2024, 3783 of 2025,

3632 of 2025, 3781 of 2025, 3627 of 2025, 2298 of 2025,

3597 of 2025, 3612 of 2025, 8819 of 2025,

4046 of 2025, 4039 of 2025, 3614 of 2025, 19838 of 2024,

19825 of 2024, 19816 of 2024, 19791 of 2024, 15559 of 2024,

28412 of 2024, 2289 of 2025, 34068 of 2025, 4212 of 2026,

27582 of 2024, 13063 of 2024, 21771 of 2024, 13034 of 2024,

21662 of 2024, 26498 of 2024, 26322 of 2024, 23306 of 2024,

22736 of 2024, 1979 of 2025, 1958 of 2025, 1929 of 2025,

1930 of 2025, 1798 of 2025, 1839 of 2025, 1790 of 2025,

1791 of 2025, 31104 of 2024, 233 of 2025, 30994 of 2024,

31063 of 2024, 28084 of 2024, 26448 of 2024, 26492 of 2024,

27613 of 2024, 8822 of 2025, 8824 of 2025, 8826 of 2025,

8850 of 2025, 5127 of 2026, 28796 of 2024, 29012 of 2024,

28980 of 2024, 28851 of 2024, 28804 of 2024, 28850 of 2024,

28978 of 2024, 28273 of 2024, 28199 of 2024, 28197 of 2024,

13016 of 2024 and 25106 of 2025

Writ Petition No.179 of 2025:

Between:

1. DPRAVEEN KUMAR REDDY,, S/O. D.TULASI REDDY, AGED

ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC - CONTRACTOR, R/O.D.NO.5-5-89,

ULIMELLA VILLAGE, PULIVENDULA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA

DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

A N D

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

2

SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ

DEPARTMENT, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, P ULIVENDULA,

YSR KADAPA DIVISION.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in

the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court

may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, direction, order or orders, more

particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in questioning the

action of the respondents in not releasing bill payment for the work i.e..

Construction of Protection wall for the Road from Dondlavagu -

Peddakudala Road to Thernampalli (0/2 to 0/4 to 0/4 to 0/6 Km)

Dondlavagu Village of Lingala Mandal in YSR Kadapa District for the

estimated contract value of work of Rs. 11,30,754/- in respect of the bill

amount of Rs.11,81,719/- for the work executed by the petitioner despite

the claim for the payment of bill amount is raised (Token No.2024-

173539) as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the

Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release

an amount of Rs.11,81,719/- towards the bill amount for the works

executed by the petitioner and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may

be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to release an

amount of Rs.11,81,719/-towards bill amount for the works executed by

the petitioner i.e.. Construction of Protection wall for the Road from

Dondlavagu - Peddakudala Road to Thernampalli (0/2 to 0/4 to 0/4 to 0/6

Km) Dondlavagu Village of Lingala Mandal in YSR Kadapa District,

pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K NAVEEN KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following:

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

3

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NOs: 179 of 2025, 29050 of 2024,

29079 of 2024, 29140 of 2024, 29134 of 2024, 3783 of 2025,

3632 of 2025, 3781 of 2025, 3627 of 2025, 2298 of 2025,

3597 of 2025, 3612 of 2025, 8819 of 2025,

4046 of 2025, 4039 of 2025, 3614 of 2025, 19838 of 2024,

19825 of 2024, 19816 of 2024, 19791 of 2024, 15559 of 2024,

28412 of 2024, 2289 of 2025, 34068 of 2025, 4212 of 2026,

27582 of 2024, 13063 of 2024, 21771 of 2024, 13034 of 2024,

21662 of 2024, 26498 of 2024, 26322 of 2024, 23306 of 2024,

22736 of 2024, 1979 of 2025, 1958 of 2025, 1929 of 2025,

1930 of 2025, 1798 of 2025, 1839 of 2025, 1790 of 2025,

1791 of 2025, 31104 of 2024, 233 of 2025, 30994 of 2024,

31063 of 2024, 28084 of 2024, 26448 of 2024, 26492 of 2024,

27613 of 2024, 8822 of 2025, 8824 of 2025, 8826 of 2025,

8850 of 2025, 5127 of 2026, 28796 of 2024, 29012 of 2024,

28980 of 2024, 28851 of 2024, 28804 of 2024, 28850 of 2024,

28978 of 2024, 28273 of 2024, 28199 of 2024, 28197 of 2024,

13016 of 2024 and 25106 of 2025

C O M M O N O R D E R

The Writ Petitioners in the batch of these Writ Petitions, who

are Contractors and firms are claiming the respective amounts for

executing the respective contract works assigned to them by the

respondent authorities. Since the point involved in all these Writ

Petitions is one and the same, at request of all the counsel, they

are being taken up together and disposed of, by this Common

Order.

2. In these Writ Petitions, the Writ Petitioners are seeking

to declare the action of the respondents in not releasing the

payments for the bills submitted for execution of the respective

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

4

works by them, and consequently, seek direction to the

respondents to release the pending bill amounts for the said works

executed by the Writ Petitioners.

3. Heard all the learned counsel appearing for the parties

on record.

4. The Writ Petitioners claim to be Civil Contractors. The

details of the works claimed to have been executed by the Writ

Petitioners and the amounts claimed due by them for execution of

the respective works, are as under:

Sl.

No.

Writ Petition No. Description of Works executed by the petitioner Amount Claimed

1. W.P.No.179 of 2025

Construction of Protection Wall for the

road from Dondlavagu – Peddakudala

Road to Thernampalli (0/2 to 0/4 to 0/4

to 0/6 km) Dondlavagu Village of

Lingala Mandal in YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.11,81,719/-

2. W.P.No.29050 of 2024

1. Providing Filter and Motor (SP Set)

near Papagni River and Construction of

Dhobi Ghat at Kuppam Village and

Gram Panchayat of Chakrayapeta

Mandal, YSR District.

Rs.19,33,681/-

2. Providing CC Road from Obul Reddy

House to Devara House in

Marellamadaka Village and Gram

Panchayat of Chakrayapeta Mandal,

YSR District.

3. Providing CC Road from Bhushanam

House to Obul Reddy House in

Marellamadaka Village and Gram

Panchayat of Chakrayapeta, YSR

District.

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

5

4. Providing CC Road from Devara

House to Sedabavi in Marellamadaka

Village and Gram Panchayat of

Chakrayapeta, YSR District.

3. W.P.No.29079 of 2024

Providing Painting and Electrification to

SW Hostel for Girls at Nallapureddypalli

Village of Pulivendula Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.10,04,592/-

4. W.P.No.29140 of 2024

Construction of Toilet and Water

Supply, near Banukota Temple o f

Ahobhilapuram Village of

Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.10,25,760/-

5. W.P.No.29134 of 2024

Construction of Library Building at

Vemula (V & M), YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.19,62,974/-

6. W.P.No.3783 of 2025

Construction of 6 Nos. Single Row Pipe

Culvert on Balapanuru to

Kamasamudram Road in Balapanuru

(V & GP) of Simhadripuram Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.16,29,779/-

7. W.P.No.3632 of 2025

Construction of Low Level Vented

Causeway on Peddakudala Dova near

Ravi prakash fields in Balapanuru (V &

GP) of Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.20,61,833/-

8. W.P.No.3781 of 2025

Construction of Low Level Vented

Causeway on Kuchalaku Dova near

Pullareddy Thota in Balapanuru (V &

GP) of Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.15,09,428/-

9. W.P.No.3627 of 2025

Providing BT Road to the road from

K.Velamavaripalli to Pulivendula of

Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.30,75,997/-

10. W.P.No.2298 of 2025

Construction of Side Drainage, near BC

Colony at Ravulakolanu Village of

Simhadripuram Mandal.

Rs.15,62,060/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

6

11. W.P.No.3597 of 2025

Construction of Low Level Vented

Causeway on Madhava Vanka Dova in

Balapanuru (V & GP) of Simhadripuram

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.21,49,776/-

12. W.P.No.3612 of 2025

Construction of Low Level Vented

Causeway and Protection Wall across

Pandulakonda Vanka in Balapanuru (V

& GP) of Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.13,77,806/-

13. W.P.No.8819 of 2025

Construction of Compound Wall to

Hindu Burial Ground at

katlagantivaripalli (V), Kallurupalli (GP),

Chakrayapeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.19,00,986/-

14. W.P.No.4046 of 2025

Providing Borewell RO Plant and

Epoxy flooring inside the Banana Cold

Storage in Brahmanapalli Village,

Pulivendula (M), YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.23,43,256/-

15. W.P.No.4039 of 2025

Levelling and earthwork filling at East

side of Banana Research Centre,

Nallapureddypalli (V) of Pulivendula

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.19,64,247.95

paise

16. W.P.No.3614 of 2025

Construction of Low Level Vented

Causeway on Peddakudala Dova near

Mohinuddin fields in Balapanuru (V &

GP) of Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.19,67,751/-

17.

W.P.No.19838 of 2024

Drilling 369 bore wells under YSR

Jalakala Bore Well works in different

Mandals in Pulivendula Constituency.

Rs.48,31,975/-

18.

W.P.No.19825 of 2024

Drilling 369 bore wells under YSR

Jalakala Bore Well works in different

Mandals in Pulivendula Constituency.

Rs.53,40,527/-

19.

W.P.No.19816 of 2024

Drilling 369 bore wells under YSR

Jalakala Bore Well works in different

Mandals in Pulivendula Constituency.

Rs.50,41,512/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

7

20.

W.P.No.19791 of 2024

Drilling 369 bore wells under YSR

Jalakala Bore Well works in different

Mandals in Pulivendula Constituency.

Rs.32,96,229/-

21. W.P.No.15559 of 2024

1. Providing Balance CC Road BC

Colony road from existing road dam to

BC Colony at K.Yerragudi (V & GP) of

Chakrayapeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.36,57,068/-

2. Providing 1000 mm dia Pipe Culvert

to the Thinamanakala Narava near BC

Colony Village of K.Yerragudi GP of

Chakrayapeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

22. W.P.No.28412 of 2024

Improvements to the Masjid in

Nallapureddypalli, H/o. Erraballi GP of

Pulivendula Mandal of YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.11,56,263/-

23. W.P.No.2289 of 2025

Providing internal CC Road from

Ramanamma House to Narasimha

Reddy House of Nersupalli GP of

Chakrayapeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.6,34,610/-

24. W.P.No.34068 of 2025

Renovation of Old Veterinary Hospital

Building at Nagulaguttapalli Village,

Surabhi Gr am Panchayat,

Chakrayapeta Mandal of YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.5,00,000/-

25. W.P.No.4212 of 2026

Construction of CC road from water

tank to the house of Hanumantha

Reddy in Pendluru (V & GP) of Vemula

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.8,92,598/-

26. W.P.No.27582 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall to

Gangamma Temple in Thallapalli

Village and Gram Panchayat, Vempalli

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.13,39,930/-

27. W.P.No.13063 of 2024

Completion of incomplete Community

Hall at Gavi Malleswaraswamy Temple

Rs.23,54,006/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

8

in Vempalli (V & GP) of Vempalli

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

28. W.P.No.21771 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall and

CC Road to GS & RBK Buildings in

Vempalli-1 of Vempalli Village and

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.18,44,838/-

29. W.P.No.13034 of 2024

Construction of Community Hall at Gavi

Malleswara Swamy Temple, Vempalli

Village and Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.83,38,415/-

30. W.P.No.21662 of 2024

Construction of IV x 1000 mm dia pipe

culverts on the road from PAV Road to

Pamulur Road at Ayyavaripalli Village,

Vempalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.8,82,096/-

31. W.P.No.26498 of 2024

Construction of Vented Causeway

across Nalla Vanka for the road from

Y.Kothapalli to Kacherlakunta of

Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.68,56,549/-

32.

W.P.No.26322 of 2024

1. Providing of Galvanized Sheet shed

for Kalyanamandapam and

Construction of Office Room in the

premises, relating to Sri Racharaya

Swamy and Sri Venkateswara Swamy

Temple at Chakrayapeta (V & M) of

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.67,23,830/-

2. Completion of incomplete

Kalyanamandapam near Sri

Venkateswara Swamy Temple at

Chakrayapeta (V & M) of YSR Kadapa

District.

33. W.P.No.23306 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall to

Siddeswaraswamy Temple at

Bandlayyagaripalli Village in Surabhi

GP of Chakrayapeta Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.19,23,647/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

9

34. W.P.No.22736 of 2024

Providing Fencing and Retaining Wall

to integrated pack house at

Bramhanapalli Village of Pulivendula

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.80,00,000/-

35. W.P.No.1979 of 2025

Construction of Compound Wall to

Digital Library at Atchavelli (V & GP) of

Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.15,34,896/-

36. W.P.No.1958 of 2025

Construction of RCC Pipe Culvert of

1000 mm dia. NP3 Class Pipes of 4

Rows Culvert to Pilla Vanka between

Sivalayam – Burial Ground in Goturu (V

& GP) of Thondur Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.12,82,356/-

37. W.P.No.1929 of 2025

Completion of incomplete Grama

Sachivalayam Building at E.Kothapalli

(V & GP) of Pulivendula Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.4,43,149/-

38. W.P.No.1930 of 2025

Completion of incomplete Health Clinic

Building at E.Kothapalli (V & GP) of

Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.4,24,070/-

39.

W.P.No.1798 of 2025

Completion of incomplete Culvert for

the road from Atchavelli to Jalaparthi at

Atchavelli GP of Pulivendula Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.13,33,926/-

40.

W.P.No.1839 of 2025

Construction of Anganwadi Centre

Building at Kanepalli Atchavelli GP of

Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kada pa

District.

Rs.11,75,365/-

41. W.P.No.1790 of 2025

Construction of Compound Wall to New

Grama Sachivalayam Complex at

Muthukuru (V & GP) of Vempalli

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.17,07,217/-

42.

W.P.No.1791 of 2025

Construction of Compound Wall to

Gangamma Temple in Chinthalajuturu

Village and G.P. of Vemula Mandal,

Rs.11,45,024/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

10

YSR Kadapa District.

43. W.P.No.31104 of 2024

Completion of incomplete Protection

Wall to Sivalayam Temple at

Chillekampalli Village and Gram

Panchayat, Chakrayapeta Mandal, PRI

Vempalli, PRI Pulivendula, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.3,55,996/-

44. W.P.No.233 of 2025

Providing CC Road from Sivaiah fields

to Rama Mohan Reddy fields of

Dondlavagu Village of Lingala Mandal

in YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.19,76,986/-

45. W.P.No.30994 of 2024

1. Providing CC Road from Bukka

Peddi Reddy House to OHSR new

(Water Tank) at Isukachintalapalli,

Kotturu Village of Chkrayapeta Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.26,35,083/-

2. Construction of Compound Wall to

Park near MPDO Office in

Chakrayapeta Village and Gram

Panchayat of Chakrayapeta Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

46. W.P.No.31063 of 2024

Repairs to Building and Toilets for

Polling Station No.265 at Gandikovvuru

Village of Gandikovvuru Gram

Panchayat, Chakrayapeta Mandal,

Vempalli, PRI Pulivendula, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.4,39,230/-

47. W.P.No.28084 of 2024

Construction of Protection Wall to

Vaagu near SC Colony in Kathaluru

(V&GP) of Vempalli Mandal, YSR

Kadapa District.

Rs.35,27,728/-

48. W.P.No.26448 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall to

Grama Sachivalayam Office and Digital

Library in Y.Kothapalli Village of

Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.22,82,788/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

11

49. W.P.No.26492 of 2024

Providing Road Dam and Slab Culvert

to the road from Simhadripuram –

Musalreddypalli R & B road to

Y.Kothapalli of Simhadripuram Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.33,93,061/-

50.

W.P.No.27613 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall to BC

Burial Ground in Bhumaiahgaripalli (V)

of Meedipentla GP of Vemula Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.33,09,110.12

paise

51. W.P.No.8822 of 2025

Completion of incomplete Bulk Milk

Collection Unit in Kovaramguttapalli

(V&GP) of Simhadripuram Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.19,32,315/-

52. W.P.No.8824 of 2025

Construction of Protection Wall and

Compound Wall to Muslim Burial

Ground in Lingala (V & GP) of Lingala

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.16,99,926/-

53. W.P.No.8826 of 2025

Formation of Gravel road from

Parnapalli to Chinnakotla Village

(Gandikota Water Point to Sathya Sai

Pump House) of Parnapalli (V & GP) of

Lingala Mandal.

Rs.3,83,020/-

54. W.P.No.8850 of 2025

Completion of incomplete Bulk Milk

Collection Unit in Velidandla (V & GP)

of Lingala Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.18,41,907/-

55.

W.P.No.5127 of 2026

Construction of 8VX 1000 mm Dia Pipe

Culvert near Lothu Vanka at

Kondavandlapalli Village of

Marellamadaka Gram Panchayat of

Chakrayapeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.12,82,463/-

56. W.P.No.28796 of 2024

Completion of incomplete items in

Wellness Center of New Grama

Sachivalayam Complex at B.T.Palli

Village of Surabhi GP of Chakrayapeta

Mandal.

Rs.4,53,353/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

12

57. W.P.No.29012 of 2024

Providing New Pump Set its and

accessories for Two Habitations in

E.Kothapalli Village of Pulivendula

Mandal.

Rs.10,45,605/-

58. W.P.No.28980 of 2024

Providing CC Pavement from Km 6/124

to 6/161 & 6/400 to 7/200

(Nallapureddypalli Village Limits) CC

Patchwork for Pulivendula -

Ambakapalli-Murarichintala Road in

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.16,93,265.32

paise

59. W.P.No28851 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall to

Grama Sachivalayam premises at

B.T.Palli of Surabhi (V & GP) of

Chakrayapeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa

District.

Rs.12,61,210/-

60. W.P.No.28804 of 2024

Completion of incomplete items in RBK

Building and Construction of Sump,

Septic Tank of New Grama

Sachivalayam Complex at B.T.Palli

Village of Surabhi GP of Chakrayapeta

Mandal.

Rs.4,49,201/-

61. W.P.No.28850 of 2024

Providing Pipe Drain (UGD) at

Paidipalem village of Simhadripuram

Mandal.

Rs.26,61,805/-

62. W.P.No.28978 of 2024

Augmentation of PWS Schem e to

Karnapapayapalli Village of Lingala

Mandal.

Rs.16,59,217/-

63. W.P.No.28273 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall to

Burial Ground in Kota (V) of

Meedipentla GP of Vemula Mandal,

YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.24,63,671/-

64. W.P.No.28199 of 2024

Construction of Rythu Barosa Kendram

at Vemula Village and GP of Vemula

Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

Rs.14,48,437/-

65. W.P.No.28197 of 2024

Construction of Compound Wall to

Grama Sachivalayam Complex at

E.Kothapalli Village and GP of

Rs.12,99,177/-

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

13

Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Ka dapa

District.

66. W.P.No.25106 of 2025

Construction of Wall to Grama

Sachivalayam Building in Alireddypalli

Village and Gram Panchayat, Vempalli

Mandal, YSR District.

Rs.10,03,582/-

67. W.P.No.13016 of 2024

Construction of Retaining Wall

(Cantilever Type) at Building outside

gravel filling, dismantling of old

buildings, preparation work for old

building site near Government School

at Mandal Mini Secretariat Complex at

Pulivendula, YSR District.

Rs.49,68,849/-

5. It is the case of the Writ Petitioners that they executed

the aforesaid respective works as per the Agreements entered into,

with the respondents, and the respondent authorities examined and

scrutinized the same, and made entries in the M-Book, but the

respondent authorities are not taking steps to release the amounts

to the Writ Petitioners. Though the Writ Petitioners approached the

respondent authorities on multiple occasions, requesting for

payment of pending bills amount, the authorities are not releasing

the amounts due to them. According to the Writ Petitioners, having

executed the works satisfactorily, within the prescribed time, non-

payment of the bills amount is arbitrary and unjustified, and the

delay in payment is causing severe financial hardship,

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

14

necessitating the filing of the present Writ Petitions seeking

appropriate directions for release of the outstanding amounts.

6. Respondent No.10-the Director General, Vigilance &

Enforcement, Vijayawada, filed counter-affidavit in Writ Petition

No.19791 of 2024, denying the contents of the Writ affidavit, inter

alia contending that pursuant to the Orders of this respondent, vide

Memo No.0215/V&E /Engg./2025-2, dated 03.04.2025, the

Regional Vigilance and Enforcement Officer, Kadapa had

undertaken inquiry in respect of works sanctioned under the PADA

(Pulivendula Area Development Authority) Programme. It is further

contended that out of 4,935 works sanctioned under the said

programme, 3,510 works were executed. During initial phase of

inquiry, 279 works were taken up randomly for investigation and an

interim report in respect thereof was submitted to this respondent

on 24.10.2025.

(b) It is further stated in the counter-affidavit that during

the course of inquiry, serious irregularities were noticed in 92

works, warranting proposals for recovery of amount to a tune of

Rs.8.95 crores. The irregularities included – claims made towards

agreement items that were found unexecuted during the field

verification, submission of false information regarding existing

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

15

commitments and turnover, inflation of turnover figures, and

production of fabricated and forged experience certificates for

securing tenders in violation of G.O.Ms.No.94, dated 01.07.2003.

Thereafter, in order to facilitate a comprehensive examination of

the remaining executed works under the PADA Programme, further

instructions were issued vide Memo No.0215/V&E/Engg./2025,

dated 01.04.2026.

(c) It is further stated that the Vigilance Inquiry is

independent of the statutory and administrative functions of the

executing Departments relating to the scrutiny, processing, and

release of payments, and this respondent had neither issued any

direction, restraining the competent authorities from considering the

claim of the Contractors who executed the works nor advised them

to await completion of the Vigilance Inquiry before taking an

appropriate decision in accordance with applicable Rules. It is

further stated that the findings, if any, of the Vigilance and

Enforcement Department, are only advisory and recommendatory

in nature, and are placed before the competent authorities for such

action as may be deemed appropriate in accordance with law. In

the event any irregularity warranting recovery is noticed

subsequently, it is always open to the competent authorities to

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

16

initiate appropriate action in accordance with law. Therefore, the

petitioners cannot attribute the alleged non-release of payments to

any action or omission on the part of this respondent. Hence, it is

prayed to dismiss the Writ Petition.

7. Perused the entire material available on record.

8. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that

there is no dispute with regard to the fact that the respondent

authorities assigned the respective contract works, as mentioned

supra, to the respective Writ Petitioners. Grievance of the Writ

Petitioners is that though they executed the said contract works

within the stipulated time to the satisfaction of the respondent

authorities, the respondent authorities are not releasing the

payments covered under the bills that were submitted by the Writ

Petitioners for the amounts spent by them for executing the

respective works.

9. Many of the subject Writ Petitions were instituted in the

years 2024 and 2025, and some of them in the month of February,

2026. As per Rule 12 (i) (a) of the Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 of

the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, every respondent in every Writ

Petition intending to enter appearance and oppose any Writ

Petition on which notice is issued by the High Court, shall enter

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

17

appearance and file a Counter Affidavit in opposition as soon as

may be and in any event one hundred and twenty days from the

date of service of notice in the Writ Petition or the Service of Rule

nisi on the said Respondent. Despite adjourning the Writ Petitions

from time to time for filing counter-affidavits by the respondents, the

counter-affidavits have not been filed within the stipulated period of

120 days as per the Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977. Therefore, this

Court is constrained to proceed with the Writ Petitions basing on

the material available on record.

10. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance

and Planning submits that during the period from 2019 to 2024,

certain developmental works were executed under the erstwhile

PADA, and subsequently, the PADA was closed by the

Government in the year 2024.

11. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that

even according to the respondents, there is no dispute with regard

to execution of the respective works by the Writ Petitioners, and the

Writ Petitioners’ entitlement for the net amount. On this aspect, it is

pertinent to refer a Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M/s.

Utkal Highways Engineers and Contractors v. Chef General

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

18

Manager & Ors.

1

, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court held as under:

(paragraph No.8)

“Be that as it may, the High Court has not dealt with

the merits of the Writ Petition. Moreover, it is not an inviolable

rule that no money claim can be adjudicated upon in exercise

of Writ jurisdiction. Non-payment of admitted dues, inter alia,

may be considered an arbitrary action on the part of

respondents and for claiming the same, a Writ Petition may

lie. Further, throwing a Writ Petition on ground of availability

of alternative remedy after 10 years, particularly, when parties

have exchanged their affidavits, it not the correct course

unless there are disputed questions of fact which by their very

nature cannot be adjudicated upon without recording formal

evidence.”

12. It is also pertinent to refer to a decision of the Hon’ble

Apex Court in Hari Krishna Mandir Trust v. St ate of

Maharashtra and Others

2

wherein it is held as under: (paragraph

Nos.100 and 101)

“100. The High Courts’ exercising their jurisdiction

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, not only have the

power to issue a Writ of Mandamus or in the natur e of

Mandamus, but are duty-bound to exercise such power, where

the Government or a public authority has failed to exercise or

has wrongly exercised discretion conferred upon it by a statute,

or a rule, or a policy decision of the Government or has

1

2025 SCC OnLine SC 1400

2

AIR 2020 Supreme Court 3969.

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

19

exercised such discretion mala fide, or on irrelevant

consideration.

101. In all such cases, the High Court must issue a

Writ of Mandamus and give directions to compel performance in

an appropriate and lawful manner of the discretion conferred

upon the Government or a public authority.”

13. Further, in Kashmir Wood Products v. Verinag

Development Authority and Others

3

, the High Court of Jammu &

Kashmir held as under: (paragraph No.8)

“8. It is astonishing to note that despite there being no

dispute as regards the claim of the petitioners, the respondents

have sit over the matter for the last more than six years and

they have not released the payment in favour of the petitioner. If

the requisite funds were not available with the respondents,

they had no business to allot the work to the petitioner and if in

spite of financial constraints, the respondents have made the

petitioner to execute the work out of his own funds, it is their

bounden duty to reimburse the petitioner at the earliest, that too

with interest.”

Since, in the case on hand, the amounts payable are

admitted and undisputed, non-payment thereof amounts to

arbitrary action on the part of the respondents, and hence, the Writ

Petitions are maintainable.

3

2021 SCC OnLine J&K 814.

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

20

14. The only contention of the learned Assistant

Government Pleader is that a Vigilance Inquiry was initiated basing

on the complaints received with regard to some irregularities that

occurred in execution of PADA works, and that the Director

General (Vigilance and Enforcement), Vijayawada is conducting

inquiry and the Inquiry Report is awaited. According to the

respondents, since Vigilance Inquiry is contemplated and report is

awaited, the respective amounts payable to the Writ Petitioners

have been kept pending. On this aspect, a perusal of the counter-

affidavit filed by the Director General, Vigilance & Enforcement,

Vijayawada goes to show that the Vigilance Inquiry is independent

of the statutory and administrative functions of the executing

Departments, relating to scrutiny, processing and release of

payments and that, the said authority had not issued any direction

restraining the authorities competent, from considering the claim of

the Contractors, and it had not advised them to await completion of

the Vigilance Inquiry before taking appropriate decision in regard to

the claims. From the said counter-affidavit, it is clear that in the

event, any irregularity, warranting recovery is noticed subsequently,

it is open to the competent authorities to initiate appropriate action

in accordance with law. In regard to pendency of Vigilance Inquiry,

it is also pertinent to refer to a decision rendered by Coordinate

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

21

Bench of this Court, in Katta Chinna Kotaiah v. The State of

Andhra Pradesh

4

wherein, this Court held as under:

“The Apex Court and this Court in catena of decisions

held that when there is non-payment of the undisputed bills, the

same is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of

India. The counsel for the petitioner rightly placed reliance on the

decision of the Apex Court in M/s. Surya Constructions v. State

of Uttar Pradesh and others [(2019) 16 SCC 794], following the

judgment in ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee

Corporation of India Ltd. [2004 (3) SCC 553]. In view of the Apex

Court judgment, the contention of the learned Government

Pleader that the Writ Petition is not maintainable before this

Court could not be countenanced. The bills of the petitioner

dated 13.03.2019 are admitted by the respondents and

forwarded for payment after due measurements and obtaining

quality control and the Vigilance report. Hence, the authorities

are stopped from stating that the bills are submitted without

executing the works. On the mere ground of pendency of

Vigilance report, payment cannot be stopped. Accordingly, there

shall be a direction to the respondents to pay the bill amount of

Rs.8,08,828/- to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from

the date of receipt of copy of this order.”

15. In the case on hand, the only ground for not releasing

the amounts to the Writ Petitioners/Contractors is that the

authorities are awaiting Vigilance Inquiry Report. As held in the

aforesaid decision, mere pending receipt of the Vigilance Inquiry

Report is not a ground to withhold the payments. Even according to

4

MANU/AP/0721/2022.

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

22

the counter-affidavit filed by the Director General, Vigilance and

Enforcement, Vijayawada, the Writ Petitioners cannot attribute the

alleged non-release of payments to any action or omission on the

part of the said respondent, and that the said respondent had

neither issued any direction, restraining the competent authorities

from considering the Writ Petitioner’s claim nor advised them to

await completion of the Vigilance Inquiry before taking appropriate

decision in accordance with the applicable Rules. When an

instrumentality of the State acts contrary to the public good and

public interest, unfairly, unjustly and unreasonably, in its

contractual, constitutional or statutory obligations, it really acts

contrary to the constitutional guarantee found in Article 14 of the

Constitution of India. It is not the case of the respondents that the

contracts in question were obtained either by fraud or

misrepresentation. When once the respondent No.10, in clear

terms stated that the action or omission on the part of this

respondent cannot be attributed for non-release of payments, there

is no other reason for the respondent authorities in not releasing

the amounts in favour of the Writ Petitioners. Therefore, in the

aforesaid circumstances, in the considered opinion of this Court,

mere pending receipt of the Vigilance Inquiry Report is not a

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

23

ground for withholding the amounts for the works which are

admittedly executed by the Writ Petitioners.

16. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Surya Constructions v.

State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

5

held as under: (paragraph

Nos.3 and 4)

“3. It is clear, therefore, from the aforesaid Order

dated 22.03.2014 that there is no dispute as to the amount that

has to be paid to the appellant. Despite this, when the appellant

knocked at the doors of the High Court in a Writ Petition being

Writ Civil No.25216 of 2014, the impugned judgment dated

02.05.2014 [Surya Construction v. State of U.P., 2014 SCC

OnLine All 6071] dismissed the Writ Petition stating that

disputed questions of fact arise and that the amount due arises

out of a contract. We are afraid the High court was wholly

incorrect inasmuch as there was no disputed question of fact.

On the contrary, the amount payable to the appellant is wholly

undisputed. Equally, it is well settled that where the State

behaves arbitrarily, even in the realm of contract, the High Court

could interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

(ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. Of

India Ltd. [ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee

Corpn. of India Ltd., (2004) 3 SCC 553]).

4. This being the case and the work having been

completed long back in 2009, we direct Uttar Pradesh Jal

Nigam to make the necessary payment within a period of four

weeks from today. Given the long period of delay, interest @

6% p.s. may also be awarded.”

5

(2019) 16 SCC 794.

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

24

17. Apart from this, when State or State instrumentalities

act in an arbitrary manner or fail to act within time, the Writ Court

does have jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

18. Learned counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioners

submit that in respect of other Districts, the Government authorities

have released the amounts in favour of the respective Contractors,

who executed the works, but in respect of the District in which the

subject works were executed, the respondent authorities withheld

the amounts without there being any justifiable reason. This Court

is not inclined to go into this aspect.

19. In view of the foregoing discussion and having regard

to all the facts and circumstances of the case, in respect of the bills

for the works executed by the respective Writ Petitioners up to

Rs.25.00 lakhs, the respondent authorities are directed to pay the

said amount to the respective Writ Petitioners within a period of

Four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In

respect of the bills for the other works executed by the respective

Writ Petitioners which are above Rs.25.00 lakhs, the respondent

authorities are directed to pay the said amount to the respective

Writ Petitioners within a period of Eight (8) weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that in the event of

SRK, J

W.P.No.179 of 2025 & Batch

25

any irregularity noticed in the Vigilance Inquiry Report, warranting

recovery, it is open to the authority concerned to initiate appropriate

action in accordance with law.

20. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. There

shall be no order as to costs of these Writ Petitions.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in

these Writ Petitions shall stand closed.

JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY

31

st

July, 2026.

DNB/DRK

Reference cases

Description

High Court Mandates Release of Contractor Payments in Andhra Pradesh Despite Pending Vigilance Inquiry

In a significant ruling concerning **Andhra Pradesh Contractor Payment Disputes**, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh recently delivered a comprehensive judgment on a batch of **High Court Writ of Mandamus** petitions. These cases, including W.P. No. 179/2025 and its numerous connected petitions, now thoroughly indexed and summarized on CaseOn, addressed the crucial issue of delayed payments to civil contractors by government authorities. This detailed analysis delves into the Court's reasoning and its implications for contractual obligations within the state.

Issue Presented Before the Court

The central issue was whether government authorities could legitimately withhold payments to contractors for completed works, which had been duly measured and entered into official records, solely on the grounds of a pending vigilance inquiry into alleged irregularities concerning the broader PADA (Pulivendula Area Development Authority) Programme.

Governing Rules and Legal Precedents

The Court relied on established legal principles and precedents from the Supreme Court and other High Courts:
  1. Undisputed Money Claims under Writ Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court in M/s. Utkal Highways Engineers and Contractors v. Chef General Manager & Ors.¹ clarified that a Writ Petition is maintainable for the non-payment of admitted dues, considering such action by respondents as arbitrary. The High Court does not need to dismiss such petitions on grounds of alternative remedy, especially when factual disputes are absent or clarified through affidavits.
  2. Duty to Exercise Power Lawfully: In Hari Krishna Mandir Trust v. State of Maharashtra and Others², the Apex Court underscored that High Courts, under Article 226, are duty-bound to issue a Writ of Mandamus when a government or public authority fails to exercise or wrongly exercises discretion, or acts mala fide or on irrelevant considerations.
  3. Reimbursement Duty for Executed Work: The Jammu & Kashmir High Court in Kashmir Wood Products v. Verinag Development Authority and Others³ emphasized that if there's no dispute regarding the claim and work has been executed, authorities have a bounden duty to reimburse the petitioner, even with interest, if funds were initially unavailable.
  4. Vigilance Reports Not a Bar to Payment: This Court’s own Coordinate Bench in Katta Chinna Kotaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh⁴ explicitly held that payment for undisputed bills, forwarded after due measurements and quality control, cannot be stopped merely on the ground of a pending Vigilance report.
  5. State's Arbitrary Action: The Court reiterated that an instrumentality of the State acting unfairly, unjustly, or unreasonably in its contractual or constitutional obligations violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
  6. No Direction to Withhold: Critically, the counter-affidavit from the Director General, Vigilance & Enforcement, Vijayawada, clarified that the Vigilance Inquiry is independent of the executing departments' functions regarding payments, and no directive was issued to restrain payment or await inquiry completion.

Court's Analysis and Rationale

The High Court meticulously analyzed the facts presented in the numerous writ petitions. The petitioners, civil contractors, asserted that they had executed various contract works as per agreements with the respondents, and these works were scrutinized, measured, and entered into the M-Book. Their primary grievance was the non-release of payments for these bills.The respondents' main contention, particularly highlighted by the Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, was that payments were withheld due to a pending Vigilance Inquiry into alleged irregularities in the execution of PADA works. However, the Court found this argument unpersuasive for several reasons:
  • Absence of Dispute on Execution: There was no dispute from the respondents that the works were executed by the petitioners and that the bills were submitted.
  • Failure to File Counter-Affidavits: Despite ample opportunity and the statutory 120-day period stipulated by the Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977, the respondents failed to file comprehensive counter-affidavits in many of the petitions, compelling the Court to proceed based on the available material, which largely supported the petitioners' claims.
  • Vigilance Inquiry is Advisory: The Court noted the specific statement in the counter-affidavit of the Director General, Vigilance & Enforcement, confirming that their inquiry was independent and no instructions were given to halt payments or await the report. This confirmed that the pending inquiry alone was not a justifiable reason to withhold payments.
  • Arbitrary Action: Relying on the precedents, the Court concluded that withholding undisputed payments for completed works, especially without a direct directive from the vigilance authority to do so, amounted to arbitrary and unjustified action by the State instrumentalities, violating the constitutional guarantee of Article 14.
Legal professionals navigating similar scenarios will find the specific rulings cited here invaluable. For quick understanding and on-the-go legal research, **CaseOn.in 2-minute audio briefs** provide concise summaries that assist legal professionals in analyzing these specific rulings and their applicability, allowing for efficient case preparation and strategic advice.

Conclusion and Directions

Based on its analysis, the High Court disposed of the Writ Petitions with the following specific directions:
  • For bills concerning works executed by the petitioners up to **Rs. 25.00 lakhs**, the respondent authorities are directed to pay the amounts within a period of **Four (4) weeks** from the date of receipt of the order.
  • For bills concerning works executed by the petitioners above **Rs. 25.00 lakhs**, the respondent authorities are directed to pay the amounts within a period of **Eight (8) weeks** from the date of receipt of the order.
  • The Court clarified that in the event any irregularity is noticed later in the Vigilance Inquiry Report, warranting recovery, the concerned authority remains free to initiate appropriate action in accordance with law.
No order was made as to costs, and all pending interlocutory applications stood closed.

Why This Judgment is an Important Read for Lawyers and Students

This judgment serves as a critical reference for several reasons:
  • Upholding Contractual Rights: It strongly reinforces the principle that governmental bodies, even in the face of ongoing investigations, cannot arbitrarily withhold payments for services already rendered and accepted.
  • Limits of Vigilance Inquiries: It clarifies that a vigilance inquiry, while important, is an independent and advisory process that does not automatically suspend a state instrumentality's obligation to honor valid contractual dues.
  • Remedy via Writ Jurisdiction: The case reaffirms the efficacy of Article 226 of the Constitution of India as a powerful tool for contractors to seek relief against arbitrary state action, even in matters typically considered contractual.
  • Procedural Diligence: The Court's emphasis on the respondents' failure to file counter-affidavits highlights the importance of timely and substantive responses in legal proceedings.
  • Balancing Interests: It strikes a balance by directing payment for undisputed work while preserving the State's right to recover funds if future irregularities are proven, ensuring justice for both parties.
--- Disclaimer: All information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, readers are advised to consult with a qualified legal professional for advice pertaining to their specific circumstances.

Legal Notes

Add a Note....

Advance Search Tool

💡 How to Get the Best Legal Answers:

1. Keep it simple: Frame your question in plain language.

2. Add scope: Tag @ a court, judge, year, or act section for accurate results.

3. Attach files: Upload a PDF only if you are using a private document.

🌍 Ask in your language: English • Hindi • Assamese • Bangla • Gujarati • Kannada • Malayalam • Marathi • Odia • Punjabi • Tamil • Telugu • Urdu

Add research context Type to filter