As per case facts, a First Information Report was filed by the father-in-law of the appellant, alleging harassment of his daughter and demands for money and land transfer. It was ... claimed that the appellant and his family refused to take the daughter to the United Kingdom unless her property was transferred to them. The High Court allowed a revision petition, directing charges under specific sections of the Indian Penal Code to be framed against the appellant. The question arose whether the High Court's direction to frame additional charges was appropriate based on the material available. Finally, the Supreme Court found sufficient material connecting the ingredients of the offenses and upheld the High Court's decision, stating that the veracity of depositions is a trial matter.