As per case facts, the Plaintiff filed an appeal after lower courts dismissed his suit for possession by redemption of land, which was originally mortgaged by Waryam Singh to Aala ... Singh prior to partition. The defendants, legal heirs of the mortgagee, admitted the mortgage's existence and their possession but argued the suit was time-barred and that mortgage details were not proven. The question arose whether a suit for redemption of a usufructuary mortgage could be time-barred, especially when the mortgage was admitted by the defendants, and if strict proof of details was necessary despite admissions. Finally, the High Court, relying on precedents, ruled that usufructuary mortgages are always redeemable and not subject to limitation. It also held that once a mortgage is admitted, courts cannot insist on strict proof of its details. Thus, the appeal was allowed, and the plaintiff's suit for possession by redemption was decreed.