As per the case facts, the High Court issued an interim stay against an order from the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The appeal to the Supreme Court challenges this ... interim order, questioning the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against an order of the National Commission and the scope of the High Court's power to grant such interim relief. The question arose whether a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is maintainable against an order of the National Commission and, if so, the extent of the High Court's jurisdiction in granting interim relief. Finally, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that a writ petition under Article 227 is indeed maintainable against National Commission orders. However, it also stated that High Courts, when considering interim relief, must be mindful of the limited supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.