Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per the case facts, the Supreme Court initiated contempt proceedings against Perry Kansagra due to his actions related to previous judgments and orders, specifically concerning the custody of Aditya
...and the need for Union agencies to assist in securing custody and presence before the Court. The reason for the appeal to the Supreme Court is to address the non-compliance with its previous orders. The question arose whether Perry Kansagra was in contempt of court and what enforcement actions were necessary to ensure compliance with the court's directives regarding custody and appearance. Finally, the Supreme Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation to initiate criminal proceedings against Perry and secure Aditya's custody to Smriti. Additionally, the Ministry of External Affairs and the Indian Embassy in Kenya were mandated to provide all possible assistance to Smriti in this endeavor. The Court emphasized that all Union agencies were to exercise all powers for effective implementation of the orders.
Bench
Applied Acts & Sections
No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case
Source & Integrity Notice
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....