As per case facts, Defendant No.3, the appellant, challenged the lower courts' findings regarding the estate of Pritam Singh, who died on 25.06.2008. The appellant had propounded a WILL dated ... 04.06.2008, claiming Pritam Singh bequeathed his entire property to her. The lower courts concluded the WILL was surrounded by suspicious circumstances, including an incorrect description of children, the testator's death 21 days after execution, and an attesting witness failing to confirm the WILL was read to the testator or identify his other signatures. The question arose whether the propounder successfully discharged the burden of proving the WILL's execution under Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and removed the suspicious circumstances. Finally, the High Court held that the propounder failed to satisfy the necessary ingredients of Section 63(c) and did not dispel the suspicious circumstances. It noted the WILL's incorrect mention of children and absence of evidence supporting claims of prior property distribution to heirs. Finding no question of law, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower courts' factual findings.