As per case facts, the Petitioner husband sought restitution of conjugal rights, alleging his Respondent wife withdrew from his society without reasonable excuse, took ornaments, and pressured him to become ... a 'Ghar Jamai'. The wife counter-alleged dowry demands for a side business and pressure to leave her government job, asserting she faced torture. The Family Court dismissed the suit, finding the wife had valid reasons for living separately. The Petitioner appealed, contending the Family Court's Order was perverse and overlooked evidence. The question arose whether the Family Court's finding that the wife had reasonable grounds for separation, thus denying restitution, was a perverse conclusion. Finally, the High Court affirmed that the Family Court's Judgment was not perverse, agreeing that the wife's insistence on her job and the circumstances provided sufficient and reasonable grounds for her separate residence.