As per case facts, petitioners are Haryana State employees with 40% or more disability. Rule 143 of the Haryana Civil Service (General) Rules, 2016, limited extended superannuation to 60 years ... only for employees with 70% or more disability or blindness, compelling others to retire at 58. This policy stemmed from a request by a disabled employees' association and previous instructions for blind employees. The question arose whether the State could restrict extended superannuation benefits based on a 70% disability threshold or blindness, given the 40% disability criterion in the 1995 and 2016 Acts, and if a fresh disability certificate from PGIMS, Rohtak, could be mandated. Finally, the High Court found no logical basis for the 70% disability/blindness classification, deeming it arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and the Acts. It read down Rule 143, granting all differently-abled employees with a disability certificate under the Acts the right to superannuation at 60 years and quashed Note 3, which required the PGIMS Rohtak examination. The Court also noted the State's power to fix superannuation age but stressed the decision must align with the Acts.