As per case facts, the appellant, a returned candidate, challenged the High Court's dismissal of her applications to strike off parts of an Election Petition and dismiss it in limine. ... The Election Petition alleged that the appellant had suppressed her spouse's income tax details in Form 26, leading to a void election under Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the RP Act. The appellant argued that the petition lacked material facts and contained vague allegations. The question arose whether the Election Petition provided a concise statement of "material facts" as required by Section 83(1)(a) of the RP Act, necessary to establish a cause of action for declaring the election void. Finally, the Supreme Court ruled that the Election Petition failed to state the essential material facts demonstrating how non-compliance with the law materially affected the election result, or what specific information was falsely stated or suppressed. Consequently, the Court found the petition to be vague and without a complete cause of action, leading to its dismissal under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC read with Section 83(1)(a) of the RP Act.