Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per the case facts Mahesh Damu Khare challenged a Bombay High Court order that refused to quash an FIR against him which included charges of rape cheating and criminal
...intimidation The appeal argued that there was no initial evidence to support these charges The question arose whether the High Court erred in not quashing the FIR given the absence of a clear initial case for offenses like rape cheating or criminal intimidation based on the allegations in the FIR Finally the Supreme Court determined that there was no initial evidence for rape cheating or criminal intimidation charges The Court stated that allowing criminal proceedings to continue without established criminal liability would be an abuse of the legal process Consequently the Supreme Court allowed the appeal reversed the High Court's order and quashed the FIR while noting that the respondent could pursue other legal remedies