As per case facts, a minor victim, traveling on a train, was forcefully made to consume liquor and then sexually assaulted by the appellants. While one appellant was apprehended at ... the scene, the others were later arrested. The appellants were convicted under POCSO Act and IPC. They appealed, claiming improper appreciation of evidence, victim's prior exposure making Test Identification Parade doubtful, and material contradictions in testimony. The question arose whether the trial court's conviction and sentence were justified given the appellants' claims of identification parade irregularities and lack of conclusive evidence. Finally, the Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence, affirming the trial court's decision, noting that no prior exposure claim was raised by the appellants during the parade or trial.