As per the case facts the petitioner M s Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt Ltd sought a review of a Supreme Court judgment The original case involved a purchaser who violated ... an essential condition of sale agreements and significantly delayed filing a suit The question arose whether the Supreme Court's previous judgment should be reviewed due to evident errors regarding limitation and specific performance and if the purchaser was entitled to relief despite the delay and breach of contract Finally the Supreme Court identified clear errors in its prior judgment concerning both limitation and specific performance It noted that the purchaser's claim was invalid due to delay and failure to act promptly and that their breach of a contract condition meant they were not entitled to specific performance Consequently the Supreme Court revoked its previous judgment and reinstated the High Court's judgment allowing the review petitions