As per the case facts, the petitioner, M/s Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., sought a review of a Supreme Court judgment. The original case involved a purchaser who violated an ... essential condition of sale agreements and significantly delayed filing a suit. The question arose whether the Supreme Court's previous judgment should be reviewed due to evident errors regarding limitation and specific performance, and if the purchaser was entitled to relief despite the delay and breach of contract. Finally, the Supreme Court identified clear errors in its prior judgment concerning both limitation and specific performance. It noted that the purchaser's claim was invalid due to delay and failure to act promptly, and that their breach of a contract condition meant they were not entitled to specific performance. Consequently, the Supreme Court revoked its previous judgment and reinstated the High Court's judgment, allowing the review petitions.