As per case facts, a construction company challenged an arbitral award related to a contract with the railways. The company claimed the award was unfair because the arbitrators ignored certain ... evidence and internal disagreements between the members of the tribunal. The question arose whether the court should set aside the award based on claims that the presiding arbitrator ignored the views of a dissenting member. Finally, the High Court reviewed the process and the specific objections raised regarding the tribunal's internal deliberations. The court examined if the procedural errors were significant enough to violate the law and concluded the matter based on whether the final award met the standards of fairness required by the Arbitration Act.