As per the case facts, the High Court granted regular bail to a respondent involved in serious criminal charges, including murder. This decision was challenged in the Supreme Court. The ... reason for the appeal to the Supreme Court was to contest the High Court's decision to grant bail, especially since witnesses had changed their statements, raising concerns about potential undue influence. The question arose whether the High Court was right to grant regular bail given the serious nature of the offenses and concerns about witness retraction. Finally, the Supreme Court canceled the bail and sent the case back for a fresh hearing, with directions for key witnesses to be re-examined via video conferencing and for police protection and investigation into potential threats against the appellant and her family.