As per the case facts, advocates for a petitioner misused the court process by filing a vexatious petition and had been involved in similar issues before. They tendered an unconditional ... apology. The reason for the appeal to the Supreme Court was that the matter was referred to the Chief Justice due to differing judicial opinions on accepting the advocates' apology. The question arose whether the unconditional apology should be accepted given their reprehensible conduct and misuse of court process. Finally, the Supreme Court, despite acknowledging the advocates' reprehensible conduct, accepted their unconditional apology, considering their prior good records and pleas from legal associations. They were warned against future misconduct and directed to fulfill their appearances in all cases.