0  22 Sep, 2022
Listen in mins | Read in 05:00 mins
EN
HI

Narayan & Ors. Vs. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

  Supreme Court Of India Civil Appeal /6855/2022
Link copied!

Case Background

As per the case facts, a person died in a vehicle accident. The Tribunal awarded compensation, which the High Court later increased. The claimants appealed to the Supreme Court because ...

Bench

Applied Acts & Sections

No Acts & Articles mentioned in this case

Hello! How can I help you? 😊
Disclaimer: We do not store your data.
Document Text Version

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6855 OF 2022

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.1797 OF 2018)

NARAYAN & ORS. ... APPELLANTS

Versus

MANAGER ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE

INSURANCE CO. LTD.& ANR. ... RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

1. This appeal is of the claimants, which arises out of the Impugned

Judgment dated 05.04.2017 by the High Court of Karnataka at

Kalaburagi Bench in an appeal against the order of Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal (for short, the “Tribunal”) dated 28.06.2014.

2. The accident occurred on 30.03.2010 when the deceased Kiran

was riding on a two-wheeler from Sholapur to Pandharpur,

Maharashtra. During the journey an accident occurred when a Heavy

Goods Vehicle crashed into the two-wheeler and caused fatal injuries

to Kiran, who died on the spot. The claim petition was filed on his

behalf by his parents and younger brother. The Tribunal was of the

opinion that the accident did occur due to the rash and negligent

driving by driver of the Heavy Goods Vehicle. The vehicle was

insured with respondent no.2 insurance company and the liability was

fixed on the insurance company by the Tribunal. The award was made

as per the following table : -

3. The matter was taken in appeal to the High Court, which after

considering the submissions of the insurance company awarded them

increased compensation on the opinion that the income of the

deceased should be taken as Rs.15,000/- and the multiplier should

have been eighteen instead of fifteen. The High Court further

increased the compensation granted under the head of loss of

consortium to Rs.75,000/-. Therefore, the High Court awarded the

amount of Rs.17,70,000/- with the amount to be given at the 6%

interest. Though, we find that the rate of interest awarded should have

been fixed at 7.5% and hence the rate of interest stands modified.

Head Details/Amount

Occupation T.V. News Reporter

Income Rs. 10,000/-

Age 25 Years

Multiplier 15

Deduction on account of

personal expenses

50% (1/2)

Loss of Consortium Rs. 30,000/-

Loss of Estate Rs. 50,000/-

Funeral Expenses Rs. 25,000/-

Rate of Interest awarded 6%

TOTAL AMOUNT

AWARDED

Rs. 10,05,000/-

4. However, we think that the Tribunal and the High Court have

erred in not granting future prospects to the claimants in terms of the

judgement of National Insurance Company v. Pranay Sethi & Ors.

1

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the future prospects at the

rate of 40% is granted to the claimants. The total compensation

payable to the appellants would be Rs 37,80,000/- at 7.5% interest.

……..............................J.

[HEMANT GUPTA ]

.….............................J.

[SUDHANSHU DHULIA ]

New Delhi,

September 22, 2022.

1

(2017) 16 SCC 680

Reference cases

Description

Legal Notes

Add a Note....