As per the case facts this case is a reference to the Constitution Bench addressing significant questions about Articles b and -C of the Constitution The appeal arises from differing ... interpretations of material resources of the community in previous judgments particularly in Ranganatha Reddy and Sanjeev Coke The question arose regarding the correct interpretation of material resources of the community in Article b specifically whether it encompasses privately owned resources and the validity and scope of Article -C in protecting laws implementing Directive Principles from fundamental rights challenges Finally the Supreme Court affirmed the broad and inclusive meaning of material resources of the community as previously interpreted by Justice Krishna Iyer and Justice O Chinnappa Reddy emphasizing their continued relevance and basis in humanist principles The Court upheld the doctrines stressing that human beings are central to judicial philosophy and courts serve the nation by upholding the Constitution

Read more