As per case facts, the plaintiff filed a suit to declare a registered Sale Deed illegal, null, and void, claiming the suit property was ancestral and joint. The plaintiff contended ... that defendants sold more than their share based on a 1902 mutation of agricultural land. The defendants argued they also inherited a share and had not sold excess. The question arose whether the plaintiff's claim of 2/3rd share in the suit property, based on a 1902 mutation for agricultural land, was sustainable. Finally, the High Court dismissed the appeal, finding the plaintiff failed to produce the 1902 mutation order, could not prove ownership of 2/3rd share, and that the mutation pertained to agricultural land, not the suit plot in Abadi Deh. Thus, the defendants were established as owners, and the Sale Deed was upheld.