As per case facts, the applicant sought condonation of a 303-day delay in filing a review application against an order dated May 08, 2024, which dismissed his LPA. He cited ... ill health and disappointment for the delay but provided no proof. The review application also sought to modify the order dismissing his appeal, arguing factual errors by the lower courts regarding his previous writ petitions and the timing of challenging an adverse entry in his ACR that affected his ACP benefits. The question arose whether there was sufficient cause for the delay and if the impugned order had errors apparent on its face or new evidence warranting review. Finally, the High Court dismissed the condonation application due to lack of sufficient cause. It also dismissed the review application on merits, finding it misconceived and an abuse of process, as the applicant had delayed challenging the adverse entry for years and was attempting to reargue settled issues under the guise of review, without any error apparent on record or new facts.