As per case facts, the Petitioner and Respondent married in 2005 but had brief cohabitation, with the Respondent mostly residing at her parental home. The Petitioner obtained an ex-parte divorce ... decree in 2012. Subsequently, the Respondent filed a DV Act complaint in 2013, alleging general cruelty, harassment, and property demands. The Petitioner sought to quash this complaint, arguing it was an abuse of process. The central legal question was whether a DV Act complaint, filed after divorce and based on vague allegations, was maintainable and not an abuse of legal process. Finally, the Court ruled that the allegations lacked specificity and did not constitute cruelty under relevant law. Since the domestic relationship had already ceased with the divorce decree before the complaint was filed, the foundational requirement for the DV Act was missing. Thus, the DV Act complaint and related proceedings were quashed, citing abuse of process.