As per case facts, the appeal arose from Anganwadi Workers (AWWs) having SSLC with 10 years' experience, challenging the High Court's decision to exclude graduate AWWs from the 29 percent ... quota for Supervisor vacancies. The High Court believed the 11 percent exclusive quota for graduates meant they couldn't apply for the 29 percent quota meant for SSLC holders. The question arose whether AWWs with SSLC and 10 years' experience, who also possess a graduate degree, are excluded from applying for Supervisor vacancies under the 29% quota available to SSLC holders, solely due to their higher qualification, given an 11 percent quota is specifically earmarked for graduates. Finally, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment providing an 11 percent exclusive ratio for experienced graduates does not reduce the chances for AWWs with SSLC alone, nor does it disable graduates from competing under the 29 percent quota. The court found no anomaly and set aside the High Court's judgment, restoring the Tribunal's decision.