As per case facts, four petitioners sought regular bail regarding an FIR concerning a wedding reception altercation. A dispute over guests taking food led to the complainant's brother, Gaurav Tanwar, ... being severely assaulted with glass tubes, causing permanent vision loss. Petitioners, in custody for about two months, argued the fight was sudden and not premeditated, with Gaurav initiating aggression, and challenged the application of stringent BNS sections. The question arose whether the existing material and their roles justified continued incarceration, given the investigation stage. Finally, the court granted bail, finding the incident a sudden quarrel and determining that the prima facie material and attributed roles did not warrant further custody, especially since petitioners had no prior criminal record and had already served significant time.