As per the case facts, a contract was breached because the purchaser failed to perform a time-sensitive agreement, having only paid partial consideration. The matter was appealed to the Supreme ... Court to decide if the purchaser's claim was invalid due to delays and limitations under the Specific Relief Act. Finally, the Supreme Court concluded that the contract was indeed breached by the purchaser's conduct. While acknowledging a forfeiture clause, the Court, in the interest of justice, directed the vendors to refund the partial payment received along with interest.