As per case facts, the respondent, Asha Ram, was accused of raping his own daughter. The Trial Court convicted him under Section 376 IPC, sentencing him to five years rigorous ... imprisonment and a fine. However, the High Court acquitted the accused, stating that sexual intercourse was not established and medical evidence was unreliable. The question arose whether the High Court erred in acquitting the accused by overlooking reliable prosecution evidence and dismissing the testimony of the prosecutrix based on minor discrepancies or lack of corroboration, especially when her evidence was corroborated by her sister, mother, and medical reports. Finally, the Supreme Court found that the High Court committed a grave miscarriage of justice. It set aside the High Court's acquittal, restored the Trial Court's conviction under Section 376 IPC, and enhanced the sentence to imprisonment for life, with an increased fine. The Court emphasized the reliability of a prosecutrix's testimony and the extremely grave nature of a father raping his own daughter, terming it "rarest of rare" and a betrayal of trust.