As per case facts, the Petitioner challenged a Tribunal Order that dismissed his plea to quash a seniority list of Divisional Officers (Fire) and appointments of Respondent Nos. 5 and ... 6. Petitioner claimed incorrect seniority fixation due to a miscalculated recruitment year for Respondents 5 and 6, and alleged they lacked eligibility (experience in DMRC, incorrect pay scale equivalence). Respondents argued seniority followed DoPT OMs based on the correct recruitment year, and appointments met rules, also raising objections of limitation and plurality of reliefs. The question arose whether the Tribunal erred in upholding the seniority list and the eligibility of Respondent Nos. 5 and 6, especially considering the timing of the challenge. Finally, the Delhi High Court dismissed the Writ Petition, noting that the challenge to the seniority list was foreclosed as it was previously dropped by the Petitioner. Moreover, the challenge to the appointments of Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 was time-barred under Section 21 of the AT Act, as the Original Application was filed nearly three years after their appointments, and pending representations do not extend limitation.