As per case facts, a company, originating from a women's self-help group, terminated an employee following complaints of anti-management activities and inappropriate behavior. The employee contested, alleging victimization. An internal ... enquiry led to her termination, but the Labour Court set it aside, citing vague charges and lack of proof, ordering reinstatement with 25% back-wages. The management appealed. The question arose whether the Labour Court's decision was perverse or exceeded its statutory powers. Finally, the High Court dismissed the management's Writ Petition, affirming that the allegations were vague, lacked specific evidence, and the initial disciplinary steps suggested a vindictive attitude, also noting the context of the organization and the partial back-wages.