As per case facts, Harjinder Singh sustained severe injuries and permanent disability in a motor accident, leading him to file a claim for compensation. The Tribunal awarded an amount, but ... both the injured claimant and the Insurance Company appealed. The claimant sought higher compensation, arguing the Tribunal underestimated future prospects, made incorrect deductions, and awarded insufficient amounts for various damages. The Insurance Company challenged the award as excessive, asserting that the claimant had resumed work and the disability assessment was incorrect. The question arose whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal justly reflected the claimant's actual loss of earning capacity, future prospects, and suffering due to the permanent and debilitating injuries. Finally, the High Court agreed with the claimant, concluding that his functional disability was total despite resuming limited employment, considering the severe neurocognitive impairment. The Court significantly enhanced the compensation across all pecuniary and non-pecuniary heads, including future prospects, medical expenses, and pain and suffering, finding the original award inadequate and ensuring a more just and reasonable outcome. The claimant's appeal was allowed, and the Insurance Company's appeal was dismissed.