0  21 Feb, 2025
Listen in 2:00 mins | Read in 16:00 mins
EN
HI

The State of Orissa Vs. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra Ano Ors.

  Supreme Court Of India Civil Appeal /625/1967
Link copied!

Case Background

In these appeals, the State of Odisha has challenged the decision of the Orissa High Court's Division Bench, which dismissed its writ appeals due to excessive delay in filing them. ...

Bench

Applied Acts & Sections
Hello! How can I help you? 😊
Disclaimer: We do not store your data.
Document Text Version

2025 INSC 259 1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.2146 OF 2024

STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.              …APPELLANT(S) 

Versus

SUDHANSU SEKHAR JENA  …RESPONDENT(S)

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4655 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4401 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2196 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2120 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

2

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2426 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO.3352 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO.3400 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2335 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2226 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2334 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2903 OF 2024

WITH

3

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4527 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6223 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 5151 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6355 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6209 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4402 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4656 OF 2024

4

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4792 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4789 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4688 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4788 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6087 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4687 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4438 OF 2024

5

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 6393 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 4766 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 5720 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6258 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 7382 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6567 OF 2024

WITH

6

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6268 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6133 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6356 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 5502 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 5548 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6434 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6435 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

7

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 9601 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 9602 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 9603 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8435 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 9282 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10042 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 5656 OF 2024

WITH

8

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6347 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7794 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6007 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10250 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6166 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7791 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7792 OF 2024

WITH

9

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6075 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6171 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7963 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7964 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6392 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7967 OF 2024

WITH 

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7796 OF 2024

10

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7797 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7966 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7246 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10088 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6353 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7811 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

11

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7812 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7143 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7965 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7874 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7798 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7799 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8433 OF 2024

 

WITH

12

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7803 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7983 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7984 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 6191 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7978 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7982 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8434 OF 2024

WITH

13

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7618 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10085 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8431 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7981 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8432 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10649 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10084 OF 2024

WITH

14

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 9283 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10644 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10645 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 9284 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 9087 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10643 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10992 OF 2024

WITH

15

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10650 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10083 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10082 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10646 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.12297 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11598 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 19369 OF 2024

WITH

16

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17756 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12294 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10993 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11578 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12288 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11573 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11579 OF 2024

17

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10991 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11455 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10994 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11456 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11570 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11572 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12301 OF 2024

18

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12302 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12837 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11576 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11577 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12296 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12309 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

19

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11575 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12295 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11569 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10995 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11581 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11571 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11574 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

20

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11580 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15687 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12304 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12310 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12300 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12311 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12305 OF 2024

WITH

21

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12307 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12308 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12306 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15686 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15481 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15480 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15508 OF 2024

WITH

22

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18301 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17830 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18299 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15717 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15749 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18300 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17824 OF 2024

23

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17821 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17816 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17811 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17818 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17814 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 16559 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17815 OF 2024

24

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15441 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17806 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15683 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17822 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15672 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15685 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17881 OF 2024

25

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15510 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15511 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15479 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15509 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17889 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17893 OF 2024

WITH

26

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17819 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17879 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15720 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15513 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17873 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17825 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17885 OF 2024

WITH

27

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15512 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17877 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17895 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17899 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15531 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15533 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15530 OF 2024

28

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15534 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17876 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17875 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17883 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15536 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15746 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15745 OF 2024

29

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17829 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18298 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17817 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15463 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17826 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17880 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

30

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17902 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15744 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 15535 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17882 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17820 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17884 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17823 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

31

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17813 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17878 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17898 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17827 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17874 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 19408 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20509 OF 2024

WITH

32

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20508 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20561 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20563 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20560 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20562 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20565 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20557 OF 2024

WITH

33

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20558 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20559 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20556 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.           OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 20343 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 23885 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 24310 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

34

DIARY NO. 28961 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30646 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 5977 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 18515 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 27167 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28274 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

35

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28760 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28774 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28938 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28966 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 29318 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30401 OF 2024

WITH

36

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30627 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30628 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 31073 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 32950 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 32970 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 33072 OF 2024

37

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 33271 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 33441 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 19599 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 24429 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 12264 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 20764 OF 2023

38

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 24149 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 27173 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28237 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 35149 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 35545 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

39

DIARY NO. 35585 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 23891 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 25624 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28247 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28971 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 31463 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

40

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 34339 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 35346 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 22385 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 22956 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 31709 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 35341 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

41

DIARY NO. 30652 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 31345 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 31428 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 31727 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 22415 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 22412 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

42

DIARY NO. 28595 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 38231 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 16750 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 21676 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28967 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 42121 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

43

DIARY NO. 38061 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 28235 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30169 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 35336 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 20431 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 24360 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

44

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 14156 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 21155 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 21715 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 22022 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 23918 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30987 OF 2024

WITH

45

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 9851 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 11039 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 14172 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 20077 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30976 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30984 OF 2024

46

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 34856 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 27334 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 45705 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 32613 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 44816 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO.                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 26163 OF 2024

WITH

47

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 27347 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 47660 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 30968 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 47650 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 49054 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

48

DIARY NO.  50190 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 26406 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 50203 OF 2024

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).                   OF 2025

@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).                 OF 2025

DIARY NO. 27568 OF 2024

J U D G M E N T

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.

1.Delay condoned. Leave granted. 

2.In all these appeals which are before this Court, the State of

Odisha has challenged the order of the Division Bench of the

Orissa High Court by which their Writ Appeals were dismissed

due to inordinate delay in filing of Writ Appeals. Even this

Court had earlier dismissed a few Special Leave Petitions on the

49

same dispute, which were belatedly filed even before this Court.

All the same, we are now examining the cases on its merits

considering the importance of the matter(s). Nevertheless, the

casual manner in which the State authorities, particularly the

concerned department of the State and the Land Records office

Surveys Office have handled the matters is a matter of concern.

3.It is not a case concerning a few employees, rather it affects a

large number, and in turn, the State Exchequer. It is for this

reason that we were persuaded to look into these matter(s),

although initially, we were not inclined to interfere, considering

the lethargic approach of the State in pursuing these matters,

and the inordinate delay caused, which was never explained in

any   satisfactory   manner.   The   State   though   kept   filing   one

Special Leave Petition after another before this Court, not in

one   go   but   one   after   another,   most   of   them   belatedly,   to

complete a  mere  formality. For this  reason, many of  these

petitions have been dismissed on the ground of delay itself as

stated earlier, as Courts do not come to rescue those who sleep

over their rights. Be it the State.  The liability of the State on

this issue will be addressed towards the end.  Now, since we are

taking up these matters, what will be the fate of the already

50

dismissed petitions after our determination, we will address at

the end. 

4.In the State of Odisha, apart from regular employees who are

working on sanctioned posts in various departments of the

State, there are also a large number of employees, who were

working   as   ‘Job   Contractors’,   who   are   mainly   engaged   for

purposes   of   survey   and   preparation   of   maps   and   for   the

purposes of consolidation of land holdings etc. Their services

were not pensionary services and thus even when they had put

in long years of service as Job Contractors their services were

not counted for pensionary benefits, and they were not given

any   pension   post   their   retirement.   The   Rules   which   were

applicable in the State of Odisha at the relevant point of time

with   which   we   are   concerned   are   known   as   Odisha   Civil

Services   (Pension)   Rules,   1992   (hereinafter   referred   to   as

“Odisha Pension Rules, 1992”).  

5.Then a case came up before the Division Bench of the Orissa

High Court, i.e. Settlement Class­IV Job Contract Employees

Union,   Balasore  v.  State   of   Orissa   &   Ors.   (O.J.C

No.2147/1991)  (hereinafter   “Job   Contract   Employees

Union”), which was decided on 24.03.1992. The High Court

considered the non­payment of pension to Job Contractors as

51

an   unfair   practice   and   even   violative   of   Article   14   of   the

Constitution   of   India.   Many   of   the   Job   Contractors   were

subsequently regularised in service but in most cases, this

happened   towards   the   end   of   their   service   where   these

employees   had   not   completed   the   mandatory   period   of

pensionable   service   which   was   10   years.   Hence,   the   Job

Contractors   though   regularised   in   service   before   their

retirement, were still not entitled for pension. The High Court in

the said judgment said as under:

“13. … This apart, for the purpose of calculating the

pensionary benefit, so much of their earlier service

period shall be reckoned, even if there had been

breaks in their employment, so as to make them

eligible   for   pension.     The   necessity   of   giving   this

direction has been felt because, if service rendered

after   regularisation   alone   shall   be   counted   for

pensionary benefit, most of the present incumbents

would be denied the same, because to earn pension,

ten years minimum service is necessary, which most

of the incumbents at hand would not put in after

regularisation as they would retire before completing

this   period   having   been   appointed   two   decades

back.”

The   State   of   Odisha   subsequently   published   an   Office

Memorandum dated 12

th

 December, 1997 where it repeated what

has been said by the High Court in its Division Bench Judgment,

while counting a part of the service of Job Contractors for grant of

pension:  

52

“2. According to Finance Department Resolution No.

22764­F, dated the 15

th

 May 1997, the job contract

employees   appointed   prior   to   the   12

th

  April   1993

(after which there is a ban for engagement of such

employees)   under   the   administrative   control   of

different Departments can be  brought over  to the

posts created under regular/pension establishment

after completion of 10 years, service as job­contract

employees subject to fulfilment of certain conditions

and stipulations outlined therein.   According to the

provisions contained in the said Office Memorandum,

the date of regularisation shall be reckoned as the

first appointment to the service for pension and other

benefits.  It has come to the notice of the Government

that some of the job­contract employees are absorbed

under the regular establishment almost towards the

end of their service and become ineligible to get the

pensionary   benefits   due   to   length   of   regular

Government   service   in   pensionable   establishment.

This has caused hardship to such type of employees.

3. The Hon’ble High Court of Orissa in their judgment

dated the 24

th

 January, 1992 in O.J.C. No. 2147/91

directed   that   ‘for   the   purpose   of   calculating   the

pensionary benefit, so much of their service period

shall be reckoned, even if there had been breaks in

their employment, so as to make them eligible for

pension’.     The   Hon’ble   Orissa   Administrative

Tribunal have also in their judgment in O.A. No. 1545

(C)/96 have categorically directed to count that much

period of job­contract service of the employees which

will make them eligible for pensionary benefits.  

4. After careful consideration of the matter, State

Government have been pleased to decide that for the

purpose of pensionary benefits only, so much of their

job­contract   service   period   shall   be   added   to   the

period of qualifying service in regular establishment

as would render them eligible for pension.  Addition

53

of that portion of job­contract service shall not be

counted for calculation of gratuity.”

Thereafter, in the year 2001, an amendment was finally brought

in the Odisha Pension Rules, 1992 wherein sub­Rule 6 was added

to Rule 18 of the said Rules, which reads as under: 

“(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (i)

&   (iii)   of   sub­rule   (2),   a   person   who   is   initially

appointed in a job contract establishment, and is

subsequently brought over to the post created under

regular/pensionable establishment, so much of his

job  contract  service  period shall be  added to  the

period   of   his   qualifying   service   in   regular

establishment   and   would   render   him   eligible   for

pensionary benefits.”

1

The judgment of Orissa High Court, the subsequent Circular of

the Government and then the amended Rules, all three gave

pensionary   benefit   to   employees   who   were   Job   Contractors

earlier, but provided that only such period of their service as

‘Job Contractors’ will be counted for pensionary benefits as was

sufficient   to   entitle   them   for   pension.   The   claim   of   Job

Contractors for considering the entire period of their service for

calculation of their pension was negated and only limited years

of service was to be counted in terms of the above, which would

1 Vide Finance Department Notification No.45856/F., dt.01.09.2001.

54

suffice for their entitlement for pension. These provisions were

never challenged before any court. 

6.All the same, on 21.10.1994, the Orissa Administrative Tribunal

in Bhagaban Pattnaik v. State of Orissa (T.A No.11/1993),

on   a   total   misinterpretation   and   reading   of  Job   Contract

Employees Union (Supra) case, held that the entire period of

Job Contract Employment should be considered for calculation

of pension. This ruling was followed by the Tribunal when it

ordered inclusion of entire period of Job Contract Employment

in calculation of pension in  Nityanand Biswal  v.  State of

Orissa & Ors. [O.A No.3020(C)/2003]. 

           The State of Odisha unsuccessfully tried to challenge

these decisions of the Tribunal before the High Court and this

Court. Clearly, the Tribunal had misinterpreted the ratio of Job

Contract Employees Union   case.   We will deal this aspect

later.

7.All the same, the same Tribunal in its later decisions such as in

All   Orissa   Settlement   and   Land   Consolidation   Non­

Gazetted Technical Officers Association v. State of Orissa

& Ors. [O.A No.3665(C) of 2001]  and connected cases on

25.03.2011, considered the amended Sub­Rule 6 of Rule 18 of

Odisha Pension Rules, 1992 along with the judgment of the

55

Orissa High Court in Job Contract Employees Union  (Supra)

and dismissed the claim of the Association for inclusion of the

entire   Job   Contract   employment   period   while   calculating

pension.  

8.Following the principle laid down in  Job Contract Employees

Union  (Supra),   another   Division   Bench   of   the   Orissa   High

Court in  State of Orissa  v.  Nityanand Das & Ors. [W.P(C)

No.11503/2008]  upheld the view of the State and dismissed

other such similar claims. Thereafter, learned Single Judge of

Orissa High Court in Judhistir Padhy v. State of Odisha &

Ors. [WPC (OAC) No. 2276/2012] again dismissed the claim of

similarly situated persons, although the State Government was

directed to consider if any further concession can be made to

the employees.  

In compliance with the said direction, the State Government

once again considered the question whether the entire service

can be counted towards calculation of pensionary benefit and it

was again turned down by a speaking order, dated 02.07.2022.

This order has never been challenged by any employee before

any Court.   Thereafter, in  Chintamani Panda  v.  State of

Odisha & Ors. [W.P.C (OAC) No.3741/2015]  and  Pitambar

56

Hota  v.  State of Odisha  [W.P.C (OAC) No.2622/2015] ,  the

Orissa   High   Court   again   rejected   a   similar   claim   of   the

employees relying on Judhistir Padhy (Supra).  

9.In the present batch of cases, the learned Single Judge of the

High   Court   relied   upon   the   judgment   of   the   Tribunal   in

Nityanand Biswal (Supra) and ordered that the entire service

period be counted for calculation of pension of Job Contract

employees. The writ appeals were filed belatedly by the State

and were dismissed on the grounds of latches.

10.We   are   totally   in   agreement   with   the   submissions   made   by

learned Senior Advocate, Shri P.S. Patwalia, that the order of

the learned Single Judge cannot be sustained.   Moreover, as

stated at the outset, the Division Bench Judgment dismissed

the Writ Appeals of the State on the first day itself, undoubtedly

on the grounds of delay. Had the Division Bench given them an

opportunity, the State would have explained the entire legal

position and the  ex­facie  anomaly in the order of the Single

Judge. 

11.At this stage, we must put on record the distinction between

work­charged employees and job contractors.   Although, this

point was never argued before this Court by any of the two

parties, we must nevertheless in all fairness state the law as it

57

stands today for work­charged employees, as distinct from job

contractors.  

12.There are judgments of this Court which have directed that the

entire service of a work­charged employee has to be counted for

pensionary benefits, once such an employee is regularised in

service.  The reference here would primarily be to a three Judge

Bench decision of this Court in Prem Singh vs. State of Uttar

Pradesh and Others (2019) 10 SCC 516  which has relied on

two earlier decisions of this Court and has held that once work­

charged employees are regularised in service, their entire period

of service in a work­charged establishment has to be counted

for pensionary benefits.  But then, that was said by this Court

in context of service rules and regulations relating to Punjab,

Uttarakhand   and   finally,   Uttar   Pradesh   [in  Prem   Singh

(Supra)].   The Rules though did not provide for pensions to

such   employees.     Although,   in   a   recent   two   Judge   Bench

decision, this Court in Uday Pratap Thakur and Another vs.

The State of Bihar and Others (2023) SCC OnLine SC 527 ,

while denying the benefit of entire period of service (as work­

charged   employees)   to   these   employees   for   calculation   of

58

pension, this Court had held that the ruling of the three Judge

Bench is in an entirely different context and stated as under: 

“22. Insofar as the submission on behalf of the

appellants that their entire services rendered as

work   charged   should   be   considered   and/or

counted for the purpose of pension/quantum of

pension   is   concerned,   the   same   cannot   be

accepted. If the same is accepted, in that case, it

would tantamount to regularizing their services

from the initial appointment as work charged. As

per the catena of decisions of this Court, there is

always a difference and distinction between a

regular employee appointed on a substantive post

and   a   work   charged   employee   working   under

work charged establishment. The work charged

employees  are   not  appointed  on  a  substantive

post. They are not appointed after due process of

selection   and   as   per   the   recruitment   rules.

Therefore, the services rendered as work charged

cannot   be   counted   for   the   purpose   of

pension/quantum   of   pension.   However,   at   the

same   time,   after   rendering   of   service   as   work

charged for number of years and thereafter when

their services have been regularized, they cannot

be denied the pension on the ground that they

have   not   completed   the   qualifying   service   for

pension. That is why, the service rendered as

work charged is to be counted and/or considered

for the purpose of qualifying service for pension,

which is provided under Rule 5(v) of the Rules,

2013.

23. Now, insofar as the reliance placed upon the

decision   of   this   Court   in   the   case   of Prem

Singh (supra) by the learned counsel appearing on

behalf of the appellants is concerned, the reliance

placed   upon   the   said   decision   is   absolutely

misplaced.   In   the   said   case,   this   Court   was

considering the validity of Rule 3(8) of the U.P.

59

Retirement Benefit Rules, 1961, under which the

entire service rendered as work charged was not

to be counted for qualifying service for pension. To

that, this Court has observed and held that after

rendering service as work charged for number of

years   in   the   Government

establishment/department,   denying   them   the

pension   on   the   ground   that   they   have   not

completed   the   qualifying   service   for   pension

would be unjust, arbitrary and illegal. Therefore,

this   Court   has   observed   and   held   that   their

services   rendered   as   work   charged   shall   be

considered/counted   for   qualifying   service.   This

Court has not observed and held that the entire

service   rendered   as   work   charged   shall   be

considered/counted   for   the   quantum   of

pension/pension. The decision of this Court in the

case of Prem Singh (supra), therefore, would be

restricted to the counting of service rendered as

work charged for qualifying service for pension.”

13.In our respectful opinion, the above interpretation by the two

Judge Bench of this Court regarding the three Judge Bench

decision in Prem Singh (supra) does not appear to be correct

as the three Judge Bench has been quite unambiguous in

asserting that the entire period of service of the work­charged

employees has to be counted for pension.

14.Be that as it may, we are still unable to grant the same relief to

the   respondent(s)   as   has   been   given   to   the   work­charged

employees by this court and as indeed was their prayer before

the High Court and also before this Court.  The reason being

that in the Odisha Pension Rules 1992, a clear distinction has

60

been made between the work­charged establishment and job

contract establishment.  In order to keep a proper perspective,

we need to refer to Rule 18 of the above rules which is as

follows:

“18. Conditions subject to which service qualifies­ 

(1) Service does not qualify for pension unless it

is rendered in a pensionable establishment /post.

(2)   The   entire   continuous   temporary   or

officiating   service   under   Government   without

interruption in the same post or any other post,

shall count for the purpose of pension in respect of

all categories of Government servants except in

the following cases, namely:­ 

(i)   Period   of   service   in   a   non­pensionable

establishment; 

(ii)   Period   of   service   in   the   work­charged

establishment; 

(iii) Period of service paid from contingencies; 

(iv) Where the employee concerned resigns and

is   not   again   appointed   to   service   under

Government   or   is   removed/dismissed   from

public service; 

(v) A probationer who is discharged from service

for   failure   to   pass   the   prescribed   test   or

examination; 

(vi)   Re­employed   pensioner,   Government

servants engaged on contract and Government

servants   not   in   whole   time   employment   of

Government; 

(vii) Service paid from Local Fund or Trust Fund;

61

(viii) Service in an office paid by fees whether

levied   by   law   or   under   authority   of   the

Government or by Commission; and 

(ix) Service paid out of the grant in accordance

with Law or Custom. 

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in

clauses (i) and (ii) of sub­rule (2) a person who

is initially appointed by the Government in a

work­charged establishment for a period of

five   years   or   more   and   is   subsequently

appointed to the same or another post in a

temporary   or   substantive   capacity   in   a

pensionable   establishment   without

interruption of duty, the period of service so

rendered   in   work­charged   establishment

shall qualify for pension under this rule. 

(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub­

rule (1) Government, may, by general or special

order, prescribe any class of service or post which

were   previously   born   under   work­charged

establishment or paid from contingencies to be

pensionable. 

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub­

rules (1) and (2) in case of a Government servant

belonging to Government of India or other State

Government   on   his   permanent   transfer   to   the

State Government the continuous service rendered

by   him   under   pensionable   establishment   of

Government   of   India   or   any   other   State

Government, as the case may be, shall count as

qualifying service for pension. 

(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in

clause (i) & (iii) of sub­rule (2), a person who

is   initially   appointed   in   a   job   contract

establishment  and  is  subsequently  brought

over   to   the   post   created   under   regular/

pensionable establishment, so much of his

62

job contract service period shall be added to

the period of his qualifying service in regular

establishment and would render him eligible

for   pensionary   benefits.   (Vide   Finance

Department   Notification   No.45865/F.,

dt.01.09.2001)”

(Emphasis provided)

15.As   stated   earlier,   there   is   a   clear   distinction   between   the

employees   who   are   in   work­charged   establishment   vis­

à­vis

those who are in job contract establishment.  The distinction

becomes obvious from a bare perusal of sub­Rules 3 and 6 of

Rule 18 of the Odisha Pension Rules, 1992 where it is given

that   work­charged   employees   who   have   worked   in   the

establishment   for   a   period   of   five   years   or   more   without

interruption and are subsequently appointed to the same or

another   post   in   temporary   or   substantive   capacity   in   a

pensionable establishment, the period of service rendered by

him/her   in   a   work­charged   establishment   shall   qualify   for

pension under the Odisha Pension Rules, 1992

2

. Compare this

with the provision relating to job contract establishment

3

  for

whom it has been specifically stated that in case of a job

contract   employee,   after   he/she   is   brought   in   pensionable

2 Sub­Rule (3) of Rule 18

3 Sub­Rule (6) of Rule 18

63

establishment, only that much period as job contract service

shall be added to regular service as would make him qualify or

eligible for pensionary benefits.

16.Again, as we have already stated in the preceding paragraphs,

these Odisha Pension Rules, 1992 or the distinction under the

law have not been challenged before any Court. As we have

already stated, this was also the point which was never even

mentioned before this Court, leave aside any argument being

made by any of the parties in this regard.  We are, therefore, at

a loss to examine as to whether the work the two are actually

performing is similar or not? Therefore, we are not in a position

to determine whether the classification itself between the work­

charged   establishment   and   job   contract   establishment   is

artificial or an unequal classification to make it violative of the

Article   14   of   the   Constitution   of   India.   Though,   we   may,

however,   mention   at   this   stage   that   the   work   charged

employees are governed by the Orissa Work Charged Employees

(Appointment   and   Conditions   of   Service)   Instructions,   1974

which are issued by the General Administration Department of

the   State   Government   which   defines   such   work­charged

establishment as follows: 

“2(1)(q)  “Work­charged establishment”   means

an establishment where the pay and allowances

64

of the employees are charged to the item of work

for which they are employed.” 

(Emphasis provided)

17.On the other hand, employees in the job contract establishment

are associated with survey and settlement and map publication

as   well   as   consolidation   operations   in   the   State   and   their

service conditions are governed by the Consolidation Manual

issued under Orissa Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention

of Fragmentation of Land Act, 1972.

18.As we have already stated above, we are not in a position to give a

finding   as   to   whether   the   distinction   between   the   two   is

artificial, being only a difference of nomenclature, and also

whether effectively, they both are performing regular work, for

the reason that no arguments have been made by any side on

this aspect.  We, therefore, leave this aspect open. 

19.Presently, in the cases before us, and for reasons which have

already given above, considering the facts and circumstances of

the case, these appeals are hereby allowed. 

20.Having made the above determination, we also feel that it is our

duty to bring on record the extreme carelessness and lethargic

manner in which the State has been pursuing these cases, both

in the High Court and before this Court.  The delay caused by

them is inexcusable. Nevertheless, we have heard these matters

for reasons we have already stated in the preceding paragraphs

65

in the earlier part of this judgment. All such cases, which were

belatedly filed, both before the High Court in Appeal and then

before this Court as Special Leave Petitions, are hereby set

apart from the rest, only for the purpose of payment of costs.

Consequently, in all such cases the State shall pay an amount

of   Rupees   One   Lakh   Fifty   Thousand,   to   the   employee

concerned.  This amount shall be deposited in the account of

the employees, or as the case might be, within a period of four

weeks from today.  This order shall not be made effective till the

above amount is deposited in the account of each of such

employees.

21.Due to the delay in filing of Special Leave Petitions some petitions

were   dismissed   earlier   as   we   have   stated   in   the   preceding

paragraphs. Now, in terms of our order here, the State may file

its review, within four weeks from today. 

22.Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 

23.All pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.            

            …………………………………….J. 

           [SUDHANSHU DHULIA]

…….……………………………….J. 

                                              [AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH]

NEW DELHI 

FEBRUARY 21, 2025

Reference cases

Description

Supreme Court Clarifies Pensionary Benefits for Odisha Job Contractors Under Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992

In a significant pronouncement, the Supreme Court of India has recently intervened to clarify the long-standing dispute regarding **pensionary benefits for Job Contractors** employed by the State of Odisha. This complex legal battle, which touches upon the interpretation and application of the **Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992**, saw a multitude of appeals reach the apex court. The detailed analysis of this ruling, alongside other crucial legal developments, is now readily available on CaseOn, offering legal professionals and students comprehensive insights into this critical judgment.

Case Background: The Genesis of the Dispute

Who are 'Job Contractors' in Odisha?

The State of Odisha employs a substantial number of individuals as 'Job Contractors,' primarily for essential tasks such as land surveys, map preparation, and consolidation of land holdings. Historically, their services were not considered pensionable, meaning even after years of dedicated service, they were denied post-retirement pension benefits.

Initial Challenges and the High Court's Intervention

This practice was first challenged in *Settlement Class-IV Job Contract Employees Union, Balasore v. State of Orissa & Ors.* (1992). The Orissa High Court deemed the denial of pension as unfair and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. To remedy this, the High Court directed that a portion of their earlier service, even with breaks, should be reckoned to make them eligible for pension, ensuring they met the mandatory 10-year qualifying service. Following this, the State issued an Office Memorandum in 1997 and subsequently amended the **Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992**, adding Sub-Rule 6 to Rule 18 in 2001. This amendment stipulated that 'so much of his job contract service period shall be added to the period of his qualifying service... as would render him eligible for pensionary benefits.'

The Enactment of Odisha Pension Rules, 1992 (specifically Rule 18(6))

The essence of this amendment was to grant pensionary benefits to former Job Contractors by counting only the necessary service period required for eligibility, not the entire duration of their job contract service.

The Core Legal Issue: Pension Entitlement for Job Contractors

Conflicting Interpretations: Tribunal vs. High Court

The clarity provided by the High Court and the amended rules was soon muddied. The Orissa Administrative Tribunal, in *Bhagaban Pattnaik v. State of Orissa* (1994), misinterpreted the *Job Contract Employees Union* judgment, ruling that the *entire* period of job contract employment should be counted for pension calculation. This interpretation was echoed in later Tribunal decisions like *Nityanand Biswal v. State of Orissa & Ors.* (2003). The State of Odisha initially faced setbacks when its challenges against these Tribunal decisions in the High Court and Supreme Court were unsuccessful. However, subsequent High Court Division Benches and Single Judges, in cases such as *State of Orissa v. Nityanand Das* (2008) and *Judhistir Padhy v. State of Odisha* (2012), reverted to the original interpretation, emphasizing that only the period *sufficient for eligibility* under Rule 18(6) should be counted, not the entire service. For legal professionals grappling with the nuances of these conflicting rulings and the precise implications of the **Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992**, CaseOn.in offers invaluable assistance. Their 2-minute audio briefs cut through the complexity, providing clear, concise analyses of these specific rulings, enabling quick and effective case assessment.

Supreme Court's Analysis: Distinguishing 'Work-Charged' from 'Job Contractor'

The Discrepancy in Pension Rules (Rule 18(3) vs. 18(6))

A crucial aspect of the Supreme Court's analysis revolved around distinguishing 'work-charged employees' from 'job contractors' under the Odisha Pension Rules. The Court noted that Rule 18(3) explicitly allows for the *entire* service period of a work-charged employee to qualify for pension if they have served five years or more without interruption and are subsequently regularized. In stark contrast, Rule 18(6), specifically for job contractors, only allows for 'so much' of their service period to be added 'as would render him eligible for pensionary benefits.' This clear distinction in the statutory framework was critical.

The Prem Singh Precedent and its Applicability

The Court also addressed its own precedents, particularly the three-Judge Bench decision in *Prem Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others* (2019), which held that the entire service of a work-charged employee should be counted for pensionary benefits upon regularization. While acknowledging this, the Supreme Court in the present case observed that the *Prem Singh* ruling pertained to different service rules (Punjab, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh) and, importantly, the specific distinction between work-charged employees and job contractors, as codified in the **Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992**, had not been challenged on grounds of being arbitrary or violative of Article 14. Therefore, without such a challenge and subsequent argument, the Court refrained from determining if the classification itself was artificial.

State's Lethargy and the Imposition of Costs

Despite allowing the appeals, the Supreme Court sternly criticized the State of Odisha for its 'extreme carelessness and lethargic manner' in pursuing these cases. The State's writ appeals were initially dismissed by the High Court's Division Bench due to 'inordinate delay,' denying the State an opportunity to present the full legal position. Consequently, the Supreme Court imposed costs of Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand (₹1,50,000/-) on the State for each belatedly filed case, payable to the concerned employee within four weeks, with the judgment becoming effective only after this payment.

Conclusion: The Supreme Court's Verdict

The Supreme Court ultimately allowed the State's appeals, thereby setting aside the Single Judge's order that directed the counting of the *entire* job contract service period for pensionary benefits. The Court reiterated that under Rule 18(6) of the **Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992**, only the service period necessary to make job contractors *eligible* for pension should be counted, upholding the statutory distinction between job contractors and work-charged employees. This judgment brings clarity to the application of pension rules for **pensionary benefits for Job Contractors** in Odisha, while also serving as a stark reminder to governmental bodies about the imperative of timely and diligent litigation.

Why This Judgment Matters for Lawyers and Students

This Supreme Court judgment is vital for legal practitioners and students for several reasons:
  • Clarity on Statutory Interpretation: It underscores the importance of precise statutory interpretation, especially when different categories of employees are subject to distinct rules (Rule 18(3) vs. Rule 18(6)).
  • Distinction between Employee Categories: It highlights the legal differences between 'work-charged employees' and 'job contractors' and how these distinctions can impact entitlements.
  • Consequences of Delay: The imposition of significant costs on the State for its litigation delays serves as a powerful precedent regarding accountability in public litigation.
  • Precedent vs. Specific Rules: It illustrates how Supreme Court precedents (like *Prem Singh*) need to be applied cautiously, considering the specific rules and factual matrix of each case, rather than broadly.
  • Importance of Challenging Classifications: It implicitly suggests that if a classification is deemed artificial, it must be explicitly challenged on constitutional grounds (e.g., Article 14) to be addressed by the court.

Disclaimer

All information provided in this blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult with a qualified legal professional for advice on specific legal issues.

Legal Notes

Add a Note....