As per case facts, the respondent, a Constable (GD) in CRPF, was terminated from service for deliberately suppressing information about two pending criminal cases and submitting fake documents in his ... Verification Roll. The High Court set aside the termination, citing the respondent's alleged unawareness of the cases and subsequent acquittal in one. The appellants, unsatisfied with this decision, appealed to the Supreme Court. The question arose whether the termination of the respondent's services was justified, given his deliberate failure to disclose pending criminal cases in his Verification Roll. Finally, the Supreme Court held that the respondent was fully aware of the criminal cases, including arrest and bail, before filling the form, deliberately withheld this crucial information, and even submitted forged reports. The Court emphasized that for law enforcement agencies, a higher standard of integrity is required, and even an acquittal based on benefit of doubt does not negate the initial suppression. Therefore, the High Court erred in interfering with the employer's justified decision to terminate services for material suppression and misconduct.