Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per case facts, a FIR was lodged by Rajender after his son Parmod was killed with a sharp object following a prior dispute with neighbor Vikas and his mother
...Angrejo. Vikas was accused of inflicting blows to Parmod's chest and back, leading to his death from internal injuries. The Sessions Judge convicted Vikas and Angrejo under IPC Section 302/34, sentencing them to life imprisonment. Vikas and Angrejo subsequently appealed their conviction, arguing false implication, interested witnesses, and discrepancies in medical evidence, while the complainant (Rajender Singh) filed a revision seeking enhancement of the sentence. The question arose whether the convictions of Vikas and Angrejo were justified and if the sentence required enhancement. Finally, the High Court upheld Vikas's conviction for murder, finding consistent eye-witness testimonies corroborated by medical evidence. However, Angrejo was acquitted due to insufficient evidence of her direct involvement or vicarious liability. The complainant's revision for capital punishment was dismissed as the case did not fall into the "rarest of rare" category.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....